Filters
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1275-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the record contains substantial, credible evidence to support the trial court's finding by a preponderance of the … This reliance was contrary to the trial judge's previous determination that any reference to the Resident Text Message …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1275-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the record contains substantial, credible evidence to support the trial court's finding by a preponderance of the … This reliance was contrary to the trial judge's previous determination that any reference to the Resident Text Message …
- A-24-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… registrant was convicted of criminal sexual contact and child endangerment for conduct that occurred at some point … committed the sex offenses that would otherwise bar termination of registration under subsection (f). Thus, … retroactively applying subsection (g) to registrant is supported by the “ameliorative” purpose of Megan’s Law, as …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3918-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for further proceedings. I Plaintiff New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (Division) has been involved … suspended the father's obligation to pay the mother child support in an effort to induce her to cease alienating Eric …
- A-3918-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3918-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for further proceedings. I Plaintiff New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (Division) has been involved … suspended the father's obligation to pay the mother child support in an effort to induce her to cease alienating Eric …
- njcourts.gov… On October 20, 2011, Shields issued her 2011 report, which supported the IAU's findings. On December 7, 2011, plaintiff … Super. 337, 355 (App. Div. 1993). An at-will employee's termination may, however, implicate a liberty interest when the termination may result in disqualification from future …
- JEFFREY SLOSKY VS. VALERIE SLOSKY (FM-15-1744-12, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… from a Family Part order denying her motion to impose child support on plaintiff Jeffrey Slosky. Defendant argues the … only addresses the court's child support 7 A-2032-22 determination. See Pressler & Verniero, Current N.J. Court …
- njcourts.gov… from a Family Part order denying her motion to impose child support on plaintiff Jeffrey Slosky. Defendant argues the … only addresses the court's child support 7 A-2032-22 determination. See Pressler & Verniero, Current N.J. Court …
- njcourts.gov… findings and holds that clear and convincing evidence supports the ACJC’s determination that respondent committed the Code violations … she was undergoing medical treatment in order to have a child with Prontnicki, and was told by her physician that …
- J.S. VS. H.S. (FD-09-2286-15, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… Eric S. Solotoff argued the cause for appellant (Fox Rothschild LLP, attorneys; Eric S. Solotoff, of counsel and on … custody, and the mother filed a cross-motion for child support. During the litigation, the mother accused the … recalculating the child support award in light of that determination. Addressing the mother's first two points, we …
- A-2216-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Eric S. Solotoff argued the cause for appellant (Fox Rothschild LLP, attorneys; Eric S. Solotoff, of counsel and on … custody, and the mother filed a cross-motion for child support. During the litigation, the mother accused the … recalculating the child support award in light of that determination. Addressing the mother's first two points, we …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-3440-16T3 A-3441-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … school. Further, mother does not dispute Dr. Winston's determination that the girls were emotionally impaired by her … is to determine whether the decision of the Family Court is supported by substantial credible evidence in the record and …
- A-3440-16T3/A-3441-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-3440-16T3 A-3441-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … school. Further, mother does not dispute Dr. Winston's determination that the girls were emotionally impaired by her … is to determine whether the decision of the Family Court is supported by substantial credible evidence in the record and …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-0853-16T4 A-0994-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … guardianship, which terminated their parental rights to the child. On appeal, Tracey contends the trial judge erred in … Servs. v. A.W., 103 N.J. 591 (1986), and is more than amply supported by the record. F.M., supra, 211 N.J. at 448- 49. …
- A-0853-16T4/A-0994-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-0853-16T4 A-0994-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … guardianship, which terminated their parental rights to the child. On appeal, Tracey contends the trial judge erred in … Servs. v. A.W., 103 N.J. 591 (1986), and is more than amply supported by the record. F.M., supra, 211 N.J. at 448- 49. …
- DAVID WEINBERG VS. MARINA S. WEINBERG (FM-02-0582-12, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… December 8, 2011, after sixteen years of marriage and one child. Their property settlement and support agreement (PSA) was incorporated into their final … on the 2011 PSA—that it expressly provided for termination upon remarriage, and also based on N.J.S.A. …
- A-2613-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… December 8, 2011, after sixteen years of marriage and one child. Their property settlement and support agreement (PSA) was incorporated into their final … on the 2011 PSA—that it expressly provided for termination upon remarriage, and also based on N.J.S.A. …
- njcourts.gov… Plaintiff and defendant were married on March 25, 2011. Two children were born from the marriage. The record shows a … as the parties litigated custody, parenting time, and child support issues. For brevity's sake, we focus on the court … ordering: plaintiff to have sole custody of the children; termination of defendant's parenting time; defendant's …
- njcourts.gov… Plaintiff and defendant were married on March 25, 2011. Two children were born from the marriage. The record shows a … as the parties litigated custody, parenting time, and child support issues. For brevity's sake, we focus on the court … ordering: plaintiff to have sole custody of the children; termination of defendant's parenting time; defendant's …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2734-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 8.21(c)(3). The judge made the following findings in support of this conclusion: All right. This is a difficult … considering those two documents in any way in making a determination. What is interesting though, is this special …