njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5790-14T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … his girlfriend. We affirm because the finding of abuse was supported by substantial, credible evidence and the Family … ipsa loquitur principles. I. There is no dispute that the child suffered abuse. The question at the fact-finding …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5790-14T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … his girlfriend. We affirm because the finding of abuse was supported by substantial, credible evidence and the Family … ipsa loquitur principles. I. There is no dispute that the child suffered abuse. The question at the fact-finding …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3114-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … conclude the record contains substantial evidence that supports the finding that it was in Amy's best 1 The FD … ruled that a permanency hearing, a parental fitness determination, a psychological parent determination, and a …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3114-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … conclude the record contains substantial evidence that supports the finding that it was in Amy's best 1 The FD … ruled that a permanency hearing, a parental fitness determination, a psychological parent determination, and a …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… 5:7-2-Application Pendente Lite 5:7-2 … Support Pendente Lite. … Applications for support, counsel fees and costs pendente lite, whether made …
njcourts.gov
… which granted plaintiff a downward modification of his child support and alimony obligations. We affirm. We take the … rightly affords to the trial judges," and disturb such determinations only where the court abused its discretion. …
-
njcourts.gov
… which granted plaintiff a downward modification of his child support and alimony obligations. We affirm. We take the … rightly affords to the trial judges," and disturb such determinations only where the court abused its discretion. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0159-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … also considered the factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 for a determination of the child's best interests. The assessment of … and disposition hearing simultaneously. The record does not support defendant's assertion of "confusion." To the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0159-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … also considered the factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 for a determination of the child's best interests. The assessment of … and disposition hearing simultaneously. The record does not support defendant's assertion of "confusion." To the …
njcourts.gov
… settlement agreement (MSA) entered into by the parties. Two children were born of the marriage, R.R. (Ricky), born in … considered a change of circumstances warranting a review of support. b. Wife's cohabitation with a person unrelated by … day period of discovery on the issues of a modification, termination or suspension of alimony, Rebecca's …
-
njcourts.gov
… settlement agreement (MSA) entered into by the parties. Two children were born of the marriage, R.R. (Ricky), born in … considered a change of circumstances warranting a review of support. b. Wife's cohabitation with a person unrelated by … day period of discovery on the issues of a modification, termination or suspension of alimony, Rebecca's …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2641-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a single argument. She contends that the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (the Division) did not … wanted James to remain hospitalized out of fear, that "home support had failed her," and she did not have a plan for …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2641-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … a single argument. She contends that the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (the Division) did not … wanted James to remain hospitalized out of fear, that "home support had failed her," and she did not have a plan for …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2972-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … competently testified regarding the medical records to support a Title Nine judgment. Lisa further argues the court … of K.H.O., 161 N.J. 337, 349 (1999) (noting in context of termination of parental rights action that "a child born …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2972-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … competently testified regarding the medical records to support a Title Nine judgment. Lisa further argues the court … of K.H.O., 161 N.J. 337, 349 (1999) (noting in context of termination of parental rights action that "a child born …
njcourts.gov
… Family Part orders which denied his applications to: modify child support; dismiss a final restraining order; vacate NOT FOR … 2024. 6 A-1257-23 garnished wages for child support; the termination of future garnishments of his Social Security …
-
njcourts.gov
… Family Part orders which denied his applications to: modify child support; dismiss a final restraining order; vacate NOT FOR … 2024. 6 A-1257-23 garnished wages for child support; the termination of future garnishments of his Social Security …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… a counterclaim for divorce, dissolution of civil union or termination of domestic partnership, the action shall …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… to Proceed 5:7-7 In divorce, dissolution of civil union, termination of domestic partnership, and nullity actions, a …
njcourts.gov
… and affirm. The parties were married in 1993; they have two children. Stacey filed this divorce action in 2016, and … mediator. 8 A-3034-19 To summarize, we affirm the judge's determination that the parties had freely and voluntarily … – that Stephen would not be obligated to pay "C.S." (child support) to Stacey until those rights were ascertained. …