njcourts.gov
… facts. The parties married in July 2005, and three children were born of the marriage, including a son, K.A., … required defendant to pay plaintiff $93 per week as child support until plaintiff relocated from the parties’ marital … required for the younger children. Then, based on his determination that the parties are a high-income family, i.e., …
-
njcourts.gov
… facts. The parties married in July 2005, and three children were born of the marriage, including a son, K.A., … required defendant to pay plaintiff $93 per week as child support until plaintiff relocated from the parties’ marital … required for the younger children. Then, based on his determination that the parties are a high-income family, i.e., …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant sought a modification of parenting time and child support based on changed circumstances. He also sought to … Farms, 65 N.J. at 484). Likewise, "[t]he trial court's determination under [Rule 4:50-1] warrants substantial …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendant sought a modification of parenting time and child support based on changed circumstances. He also sought to … Farms, 65 N.J. at 484). Likewise, "[t]he trial court's determination under [Rule 4:50-1] warrants substantial …
njcourts.gov
… Part, Bergen County, Docket No. FD-02-0935-20. Fox Rothschild, LLP, attorneys for appellant (Adam Wiseberg, on the … David Wickenden ("the father"), who shares a single child with defendant Evelien Zonneveld ("the mother"), … the Family Part's April 30, 2021 order1 calculating child support at $275 per week, representing $240 in child support …
-
njcourts.gov
… Part, Bergen County, Docket No. FD-02-0935-20. Fox Rothschild, LLP, attorneys for appellant (Adam Wiseberg, on the … David Wickenden ("the father"), who shares a single child with defendant Evelien Zonneveld ("the mother"), … the Family Part's April 30, 2021 order1 calculating child support at $275 per week, representing $240 in child support …
njcourts.gov
… and defendant Katarina J. Dockum are the parents of a child born in 2015. They share joint legal custody. … order directing he pay defendant $244 per week in child support.1 Plaintiff also appeals from orders denying his … 210. Here, plaintiff does not challenge the trial court's determination the circumstances warrant the imputation of …
-
njcourts.gov
… and defendant Katarina J. Dockum are the parents of a child born in 2015. They share joint legal custody. … order directing he pay defendant $244 per week in child support.1 Plaintiff also appeals from orders denying his … 210. Here, plaintiff does not challenge the trial court's determination the circumstances warrant the imputation of …
njcourts.gov
… June 1, 2017 order denying his motion to modify alimony and child support. We reverse and remand for a plenary hearing. NOT … provision for the change." Lepis, 83 N.J. at 152. A determination of emancipation is a legal issue, imposed when …
-
njcourts.gov
… June 1, 2017 order denying his motion to modify alimony and child support. We reverse and remand for a plenary hearing. NOT … provision for the change." Lepis, 83 N.J. at 152. A determination of emancipation is a legal issue, imposed when …
njcourts.gov
… 2 A-1040-22 compelling defendant to contribute to their child's college tuition and expenses. At issue is whether … 2009, the parties executed a PSA which explicitly included support for their child, the sole child of the marriage. … owe[d] $12,500 on this loan." Thus, he argued, "[his] determination that [he] cannot contribute further to college …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2 A-1040-22 compelling defendant to contribute to their child's college tuition and expenses. At issue is whether … 2009, the parties executed a PSA which explicitly included support for their child, the sole child of the marriage. … owe[d] $12,500 on this loan." Thus, he argued, "[his] determination that [he] cannot contribute further to college …
njcourts.gov
… 17, 2015 order that: (1) denied his motion to reduce his child support obligation for his son; (2) denied his motion to … also owe no special deference to the trial court's legal determinations. Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp. Comm. of …
-
njcourts.gov
… 17, 2015 order that: (1) denied his motion to reduce his child support obligation for his son; (2) denied his motion to … also owe no special deference to the trial court's legal determinations. Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp. Comm. of …
njcourts.gov
… cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-0598-21 custody of their child. The court determined it lacked jurisdiction over the … the record presented to the court did not permit a proper determination of the child's home state under the UCCJEA … or addressing issues related to parenting time or child support. On June 17, 2021, plaintiff filed a complaint and …
-
njcourts.gov
… cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-0598-21 custody of their child. The court determined it lacked jurisdiction over the … the record presented to the court did not permit a proper determination of the child's home state under the UCCJEA … or addressing issues related to parenting time or child support. On June 17, 2021, plaintiff filed a complaint and …
njcourts.gov
… from a May 12, 2017 order denying his motion to modify child support and compelling him to pay counsel fees to plaintiff … (citations omitted). We will not disturb a trial court's determination "unless it is manifestly unreasonable, …
-
njcourts.gov
… from a May 12, 2017 order denying his motion to modify child support and compelling him to pay counsel fees to plaintiff … (citations omitted). We will not disturb a trial court's determination "unless it is manifestly unreasonable, …
njcourts.gov
… will, hit her, and jumped on her stomach. Plaintiff and the child lived with defendant for less than a year after the … (FRO) on July 5, 2011 and ordered defendant to pay child support. The court issued an amended FRO on June 20, 2012, … The August 27, 2020 decision explained that a custody determination would be in plaintiff's favor but denied …
-
njcourts.gov
… will, hit her, and jumped on her stomach. Plaintiff and the child lived with defendant for less than a year after the … (FRO) on July 5, 2011 and ordered defendant to pay child support. The court issued an amended FRO on June 20, 2012, … The August 27, 2020 decision explained that a custody determination would be in plaintiff's favor but denied …