njcourts.gov
… declared plaintiff the psychological parent of the minor child G.M., and ordered that the parties would share joint … has not shown that she was prejudiced by the court's determination. We conclude the court's decision to allow … trial court's findings of fact are binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial and credible evidence. …
-
njcourts.gov
… declared plaintiff the psychological parent of the minor child G.M., and ordered that the parties would share joint … has not shown that she was prejudiced by the court's determination. We conclude the court's decision to allow … trial court's findings of fact are binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial and credible evidence. …
njcourts.gov
… 1 We use initials to identify the parties and their children because some of the facts discussed are taken from … which required defendant to pay plaintiff pendente lite support of $7000 per month. In June 2013, the court … of the payments. Thus, the record supports the court's determination that defendant failed to submit sufficient, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 We use initials to identify the parties and their children because some of the facts discussed are taken from … which required defendant to pay plaintiff pendente lite support of $7000 per month. In June 2013, the court … of the payments. Thus, the record supports the court's determination that defendant failed to submit sufficient, …
njcourts.gov
… order denying defendant M.J.-B.'s1 motion to vacate a 2018 child support order, he appealed. He argues that relief from the child support award is appropriate under Rule 4:50-1(c) and …
-
njcourts.gov
… order denying defendant M.J.-B.'s1 motion to vacate a 2018 child support order, he appealed. He argues that relief from the child support award is appropriate under Rule 4:50-1(c) and …
njcourts.gov
… seeking joint legal custody, shared parenting time, child support, and other relief. Defendant filed responsive … 26 A-0420-19T2 of fact, especially when credibility determinations are involved, we do not defer on questions of …
-
njcourts.gov
… seeking joint legal custody, shared parenting time, child support, and other relief. Defendant filed responsive … 26 A-0420-19T2 of fact, especially when credibility determinations are involved, we do not defer on questions of …
njcourts.gov
… . . . must the court ‘appraise the testimony, make 6 a determination of true value and fix the assessment.’” … and data presented, the court finds that the evidence supports a 14% vacancy and collection loss factor. … stabilized operating expenses, was reasonable and supported by the trial record. The court further concluded …
njcourts.gov
… 24, 2023, that granted plaintiff an upward modification of child support, and April 28, 2023, that awarded plaintiff … or her discretion"); and Rendine, 141 N.J. at 317 ("fee determinations by trial courts [should] be 10 A-2861-22 …
-
njcourts.gov
… 24, 2023, that granted plaintiff an upward modification of child support, and April 28, 2023, that awarded plaintiff … or her discretion"); and Rendine, 141 N.J. at 317 ("fee determinations by trial courts [should] be 10 A-2861-22 …
njcourts.gov
… R. 1:36-3. 2 A-4212-18T4 custody orders involving her child with plaintiff, Anson B. Orr, a resident of New … 2018. Defendant claimed she was not served with any of the supporting papers. Defendant wrote to the Family Part judge … jurisdiction was not necessary to make a child custody determination. However, defendant subjected herself to …
-
njcourts.gov
… R. 1:36-3. 2 A-4212-18T4 custody orders involving her child with plaintiff, Anson B. Orr, a resident of New … 2018. Defendant claimed she was not served with any of the supporting papers. Defendant wrote to the Family Part judge … jurisdiction was not necessary to make a child custody determination. However, defendant subjected herself to …
njcourts.gov
… 25, 2021 order denying his motion to modify his alimony and child support obligations.1 We affirm. I. The parties were married … satisfied that the findings were mistaken or that the determination could 11 A-3195-20 not reasonably have been …
-
njcourts.gov
… 25, 2021 order denying his motion to modify his alimony and child support obligations.1 We affirm. I. The parties were married … satisfied that the findings were mistaken or that the determination could 11 A-3195-20 not reasonably have been …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2521-21 A-0391-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … they contend there was insufficient evidence to support a prima facie case of abuse or neglect of Michael. … there was insufficient evidence to support the court's determination that their conduct towards Michael placed their …
-
njcourts.gov
… IV-D case, attach a Transmittal #1 and the Child Support Agency Confidential Information Form. Responding … actions) Date of support order: Current Obligation Current child support Current medical support Current spousal …
njcourts.gov
… parenting time arrangements and for a stay of his child-support obligation. We affirm. I. The parties were married in 2007. They have two children: a daughter, who was born in 2009, and a son, who …
-
njcourts.gov
… parenting time arrangements and for a stay of his child-support obligation. We affirm. I. The parties were married in 2007. They have two children: a daughter, who was born in 2009, and a son, who …
njcourts.gov
… 2 A-2254-19T2 until he paid $1000 of the $57,526 owed in support arrears, which payment was ultimately made to … that follow, we affirm. Parents charged with violating child support orders face arrest and potential incarceration … (App. Div. 2010) ("Mootness is a threshold justiciability determination rooted in the notion that judicial power is to …