njcourts.gov
… plaintiff did not present legally competent evidence to support a prima facie case of changed circumstances. See … It was defendant's second marriage. The parties had one child, born in 2005, and they were divorced in 2009. In the … agreement (MSA), plaintiff agreed to pay defendant child support, plus four years of limited duration alimony, …
-
njcourts.gov
… plaintiff did not present legally competent evidence to support a prima facie case of changed circumstances. See … It was defendant's second marriage. The parties had one child, born in 2005, and they were divorced in 2009. In the … agreement (MSA), plaintiff agreed to pay defendant child support, plus four years of limited duration alimony, …
njcourts.gov
… establishing that he is the biological father of the child born during his marriage to defendant, Noura El … second test. A few months later, the court entered a child support order for $214 per week and setting arrears at … and all the orders entered based on the paternity determination. A different judge denied plaintiff's third …
-
njcourts.gov
… establishing that he is the biological father of the child born during his marriage to defendant, Noura El … second test. A few months later, the court entered a child support order for $214 per week and setting arrears at … and all the orders entered based on the paternity determination. A different judge denied plaintiff's third …
njcourts.gov
… reconsider a March 27, 2018 order that compelled him to pay child support and other child care expenses, and denied his request to require …
-
njcourts.gov
… reconsider a March 27, 2018 order that compelled him to pay child support and other child care expenses, and denied his request to require …
njcourts.gov
… 1 We use initials to identify the parties and their children because some of the facts discussed are taken from … which required defendant to pay plaintiff pendente lite support of $7000 per month. In June 2013, the court … of the payments. Thus, the record supports the court's determination that defendant failed to submit sufficient, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 We use initials to identify the parties and their children because some of the facts discussed are taken from … which required defendant to pay plaintiff pendente lite support of $7000 per month. In June 2013, the court … of the payments. Thus, the record supports the court's determination that defendant failed to submit sufficient, …
njcourts.gov
… motion records. Plaintiff G.P. and defendant have a minor child in common. The parties never married. In August 2020, the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCP&P) "substantiated" … . . plaintiff ha[d] failed to provide any documentation to support this position . . . . The trial court entered an …
-
njcourts.gov
… motion records. Plaintiff G.P. and defendant have a minor child in common. The parties never married. In August 2020, the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCP&P) "substantiated" … . . plaintiff ha[d] failed to provide any documentation to support this position . . . . The trial court entered an …
njcourts.gov
… declared plaintiff the psychological parent of the minor child G.M., and ordered that the parties would share joint … has not shown that she was prejudiced by the court's determination. We conclude the court's decision to allow … trial court's findings of fact are binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial and credible evidence. …
-
njcourts.gov
… declared plaintiff the psychological parent of the minor child G.M., and ordered that the parties would share joint … has not shown that she was prejudiced by the court's determination. We conclude the court's decision to allow … trial court's findings of fact are binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial and credible evidence. …
njcourts.gov
… order denying defendant M.J.-B.'s1 motion to vacate a 2018 child support order, he appealed. He argues that relief from the child support award is appropriate under Rule 4:50-1(c) and …
-
njcourts.gov
… order denying defendant M.J.-B.'s1 motion to vacate a 2018 child support order, he appealed. He argues that relief from the child support award is appropriate under Rule 4:50-1(c) and …
njcourts.gov
… 24, 2023, that granted plaintiff an upward modification of child support, and April 28, 2023, that awarded plaintiff … or her discretion"); and Rendine, 141 N.J. at 317 ("fee determinations by trial courts [should] be 10 A-2861-22 …
-
njcourts.gov
… 24, 2023, that granted plaintiff an upward modification of child support, and April 28, 2023, that awarded plaintiff … or her discretion"); and Rendine, 141 N.J. at 317 ("fee determinations by trial courts [should] be 10 A-2861-22 …
njcourts.gov
… 25, 2021 order denying his motion to modify his alimony and child support obligations.1 We affirm. I. The parties were married … satisfied that the findings were mistaken or that the determination could 11 A-3195-20 not reasonably have been …
-
njcourts.gov
… 25, 2021 order denying his motion to modify his alimony and child support obligations.1 We affirm. I. The parties were married … satisfied that the findings were mistaken or that the determination could 11 A-3195-20 not reasonably have been …
njcourts.gov
… R. 1:36-3. 2 A-4212-18T4 custody orders involving her child with plaintiff, Anson B. Orr, a resident of New … 2018. Defendant claimed she was not served with any of the supporting papers. Defendant wrote to the Family Part judge … jurisdiction was not necessary to make a child custody determination. However, defendant subjected herself to …
-
njcourts.gov
… R. 1:36-3. 2 A-4212-18T4 custody orders involving her child with plaintiff, Anson B. Orr, a resident of New … 2018. Defendant claimed she was not served with any of the supporting papers. Defendant wrote to the Family Part judge … jurisdiction was not necessary to make a child custody determination. However, defendant subjected herself to …