njcourts.gov
… R. 1:36-3. 2 A-4167-17T3 endangering the welfare of a child (possession of child pornography), N.J.S.A. … and also contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for resisting arrest. Specifically, … have to give "substantial deference" to the discretionary determination made by the issuing judge. Ibid. (quoting State …
-
njcourts.gov
… R. 1:36-3. 2 A-4167-17T3 endangering the welfare of a child (possession of child pornography), N.J.S.A. … and also contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for resisting arrest. Specifically, … have to give "substantial deference" to the discretionary determination made by the issuing judge. Ibid. (quoting State …
njcourts.gov
… and defendant had a dating relationship and have a child in common. On April 25, 2021, defendant and the child … that findings by the trial court are binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence." Id. … neither the trial court nor this court can make that determination because they were not entered in the record. …
-
njcourts.gov
… and defendant had a dating relationship and have a child in common. On April 25, 2021, defendant and the child … that findings by the trial court are binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence." Id. … neither the trial court nor this court can make that determination because they were not entered in the record. …
njcourts.gov
… and defendant were married in May 2001 and had multiple children. On July 24, 2013, the court entered a dual final … and plaintiff had primary residential custody of the children. Defendant agreed to pay child support of $385 bi-monthly, and was responsible for …
-
njcourts.gov
… and defendant were married in May 2001 and had multiple children. On July 24, 2013, the court entered a dual final … and plaintiff had primary residential custody of the children. Defendant agreed to pay child support of $385 bi-monthly, and was responsible for …
njcourts.gov
… time, custody, alimony, and its order that the parties' children have no contact with his brother, Limbert Bilbao La … that Alejandra would pay Ivan $350 per month in child support, Ivan would pay Alejandra $1200 per month in spousal … owe no special deference to the . . . [court's] legal determinations." Slawinski v. Nicholas, 448 N.J. Super. 25, 32 …
-
njcourts.gov
… time, custody, alimony, and its order that the parties' children have no contact with his brother, Limbert Bilbao La … that Alejandra would pay Ivan $350 per month in child support, Ivan would pay Alejandra $1200 per month in spousal … owe no special deference to the . . . [court's] legal determinations." Slawinski v. Nicholas, 448 N.J. Super. 25, 32 …
njcourts.gov
… conviction for third-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a)(2). Defendant contends that the … defendant for second-degree attempt to lure or entice a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:13-6(a), and third- degree endangering … when the issue is solely whether an adequate factual basis supports a guilty plea, a Slater analysis is unnecessary." 7 …
-
njcourts.gov
… conviction for third-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a)(2). Defendant contends that the … defendant for second-degree attempt to lure or entice a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:13-6(a), and third- degree endangering … when the issue is solely whether an adequate factual basis supports a guilty plea, a Slater analysis is unnecessary." 7 …
-
2C:24-4a(2)
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… Revised 3/9/15 ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD, ABUSE OR NEGLECT (Second Degree) N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4a(2) … Defendant is charged with endangering the welfare of a child (Read Pertinent Count(s) of the Indictment) The … custody of a child so that the child shall be liable to be supported and maintained at the expense of the public, or by …
njcourts.gov
… they began to live together. In 2003, the parties had a child, A.P. Plaintiff also had another child from a prior … seeking joint legal custody, residential custody, and child support for A.P. It appears that the Family Part judge … joint custody of the child, visitation, and a support determination. Ibid. In those proceedings, Beverly filed a …
-
njcourts.gov
… they began to live together. In 2003, the parties had a child, A.P. Plaintiff also had another child from a prior … seeking joint legal custody, residential custody, and child support for A.P. It appears that the Family Part judge … joint custody of the child, visitation, and a support determination. Ibid. In those proceedings, Beverly filed a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Services is committed to the welfare and safety of children, families, and communities through the fair … of their sentences. The probation division also includes a child support enforcement unit that monitors child and spousal …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1067-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that, without her testimony, he had to find evidential support through "some independent corroboration." The judge … 9:6-8.21(c)(3). "In a fact-finding hearing (1) any determination that the child is an abused or neglected child …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1067-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that, without her testimony, he had to find evidential support through "some independent corroboration." The judge … 9:6-8.21(c)(3). "In a fact-finding hearing (1) any determination that the child is an abused or neglected child …
njcourts.gov
… LLC) Defendant M.G.M. appeared pro se 1 The parties’, child’s and other relevant individuals’ names are … N.F.’s objection a report from the court’s Probation Child Support Enforcement Unit of the Superior Court concerning … at trial, the court makes the following credibility determinations. M.G.F. The court finds M.G.F. credible. His …
-
njcourts.gov
… LLC) Defendant M.G.M. appeared pro se 1 The parties’, child’s and other relevant individuals’ names are … N.F.’s objection a report from the court’s Probation Child Support Enforcement Unit of the Superior Court concerning … at trial, the court makes the following credibility determinations. M.G.F. The court finds M.G.F. credible. His …
njcourts.gov
… determined S.L.W. failed to satisfy the definition of a "child" pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:16A-1(21), and that she failed to provide sufficient documentation supporting her claim. Although we disagree with the Board's … carries a substantial burden of persuasion, and the determination of the administrative agency carries a …
-
njcourts.gov
… determined S.L.W. failed to satisfy the definition of a "child" pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:16A-1(21), and that she failed to provide sufficient documentation supporting her claim. Although we disagree with the Board's … carries a substantial burden of persuasion, and the determination of the administrative agency carries a …