-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0241-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … dismiss the case with restraints and the evidence did not support the court's decision that it was in the best … stable to resume unsupervised contact." The court's determinations were based on "extensive, material[,] and …
njcourts.gov
… 2C:14-2(a)(1); third-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a)(1); and second-degree sexual … that if we consider S.C.'s argument, the record clearly supports the trial court's admission of Z.B.'s statements to … The trial court, after a hearing, made credibility determinations and findings of fact with respect to the …
njcourts.gov
… in bad faith because they were replaced by Student Support Teams (SSTs), comprised of District employees. The … that an attendance officer "who shall find" a truant child return the child to the parent or teacher, the statute "[did] not …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2041-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and S.A. (mother) are the biological parents of four children: Julius, born in 1998; Sam, born in 2006; Maria, … this 3 A-2041-16T4 conclusion because the evidence does not support he abused his children.2 We reject these arguments …
-
njcourts.gov
… in bad faith because they were replaced by Student Support Teams (SSTs), comprised of District employees. The … that an attendance officer "who shall find" a truant child return the child to the parent or teacher, the statute "[did] not …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2041-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and S.A. (mother) are the biological parents of four children: Julius, born in 1998; Sam, born in 2006; Maria, … this 3 A-2041-16T4 conclusion because the evidence does not support he abused his children.2 We reject these arguments …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2C:14-2(a)(1); third-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a)(1); and second-degree sexual … that if we consider S.C.'s argument, the record clearly supports the trial court's admission of Z.B.'s statements to … The trial court, after a hearing, made credibility determinations and findings of fact with respect to the …
njcourts.gov
… and suspension stemmed from an investigation relating to child pornography, which led to the issuance and execution … to Properly Consider and Balance the Factors Necessary to Support Total Forfeiture. 9 A-4320-17T1 C. Pension Statutes … bound by the agency's interpretation of a statute or its determination of a strictly legal issue.'" Richardson v. Bd. …
-
njcourts.gov
… and suspension stemmed from an investigation relating to child pornography, which led to the issuance and execution … to Properly Consider and Balance the Factors Necessary to Support Total Forfeiture. 9 A-4320-17T1 C. Pension Statutes … bound by the agency's interpretation of a statute or its determination of a strictly legal issue.'" Richardson v. Bd. …
njcourts.gov › notices to the bar
… during closing arguments, subject to the judge’s determination. (3) Pooling Capability Requirements. Any person … R. 5:12-4(b) Hearings and trials held by Division of Child Protection and Permanency R. 5:19-2 Confidentiality of … the production of materials for in camera inspection and determination as to admissibility N.J.S.A. 2A:61B-1d(1) Court …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives
… during closing arguments, subject to the judge’s determination. (3) Pooling Capability Requirements. Any person … R. 5:12-4(b) Hearings and trials held by Division of Child Protection and Permanency R. 5:19-2 Confidentiality of … the production of materials for in camera inspection and determination as to admissibility N.J.S.A. 2A:61B-1d(1) Court …
-
njcourts.gov
… during closing arguments, subject to the judge’s determination. (3) Pooling Capability Requirements. Any person … R. 5:12-4(b) Hearings and trials held by Division of Child Protection and Permanency R. 5:19-2 Confidentiality of … the production of materials for in camera inspection and determination as to admissibility N.J.S.A. 2A:61B-1d(1) Court …
njcourts.gov
… was distinguishable from In re S.B.2 and that here, "[t]he child was grabbed by the [] [t]eacher. The [t]eacher dragged … him across the [c]afeteria to get him away from the other child that he was 2 In re S.B., 333 N.J. Super. 236 (App. … POINT I THERE WAS NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD TO SUPPORT THE COURT'S DISPOSITION OF THE JUVENILE AS GUILTY OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… was distinguishable from In re S.B.2 and that here, "[t]he child was grabbed by the [] [t]eacher. The [t]eacher dragged … him across the [c]afeteria to get him away from the other child that he was 2 In re S.B., 333 N.J. Super. 236 (App. … POINT I THERE WAS NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD TO SUPPORT THE COURT'S DISPOSITION OF THE JUVENILE AS GUILTY OF …
njcourts.gov
… was filed October 2, 2014, literally days after her termination. The videos Lema took of Abassi and the text … wages would be limited to a ninety-day period. After Lema's termination, she obtained another job, within ninety days, … at length the judge's step-by-step consideration of the supporting documentation presented. The judge did …
-
njcourts.gov
… was filed October 2, 2014, literally days after her termination. The videos Lema took of Abassi and the text … wages would be limited to a ninety-day period. After Lema's termination, she obtained another job, within ninety days, … at length the judge's step-by-step consideration of the supporting documentation presented. The judge did …
njcourts.gov
… prejudice defendant's motion to reduce his alimony and child support payments. We affirm. The parties married in 1986 and … also agreed to pay plaintiff $2083 twice a month for child support. 1 While defendant's notice of appeal lists …
-
njcourts.gov
… prejudice defendant's motion to reduce his alimony and child support payments. We affirm. The parties married in 1986 and … also agreed to pay plaintiff $2083 twice a month for child support. 1 While defendant's notice of appeal lists …
njcourts.gov
… 2C:14-2(b); and second-degree endangering the welfare of a child with sexual conduct, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a)(1). After two … sustain [the trial court's] decision, provided it is supported by credible evidence in the record.'" State v. … there was no abuse of discretion in the judge's determination that Ava's statements were admissible under …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2C:14-2(b); and second-degree endangering the welfare of a child with sexual conduct, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a)(1). After two … sustain [the trial court's] decision, provided it is supported by credible evidence in the record.'" State v. … there was no abuse of discretion in the judge's determination that Ava's statements were admissible under …