Filters
- OLENA YOUSHKO MORGUL VS. GENNADIY KRUGLOV (FM-02-0291-18, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… from the Family Part's March 16, 2018 order modifying a child support order issued in the state of New York, and also … Thus, the court stated it was comfortable with its prior determination that it had personal 11 A-5807-17T1 jurisdiction …
- A-5807-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… from the Family Part's March 16, 2018 order modifying a child support order issued in the state of New York, and also … Thus, the court stated it was comfortable with its prior determination that it had personal 11 A-5807-17T1 jurisdiction …
- njcourts.gov… to protect privacy interests concerning allegations of child sexual abuse. See R. 1:38-3(c)(9). 3 A-1919-22 … Jersey. Because the factual findings by the trial court are supported by substantial, credible evidence in the record, … Jersey. In making that argument, Richmond contends that a determination on personal jurisdiction is separate from a …
- njcourts.gov… of the same order denying his motion to emancipate the child retroactive to a prior order entered in January 2011 and to terminate or reduce his child support obligation from that date. Both parties complain …
- A-1194-14T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… of the same order denying his motion to emancipate the child retroactive to a prior order entered in January 2011 and to terminate or reduce his child support obligation from that date. Both parties complain …
- Order Upon Preliminary Hearing Rules of Courtnjcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court… privileges and relations theretofore existing between the child and each biological or legal parent or other custodian or guardian theretofore appointed for such child shall be in all respects at an end; (b) The child may be known by the name proposed in the complaint, …
- FRANCES J. HOFFMAN VS. BRUCE W. HOFFMAN (FM-13-0908-98, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… defendant Bruce W. Hoffman were married in 1981; had four children, the youngest of whom was emancipated in 2016; NOT … and required." 3 A-1363-17T2 Defendant stopped making his support payments approximately eleven months after the … also indicated his disagreement with prior court determinations that plaintiff did not commit a fraud or …
- A-1363-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… defendant Bruce W. Hoffman were married in 1981; had four children, the youngest of whom was emancipated in 2016; NOT … and required." 3 A-1363-17T2 Defendant stopped making his support payments approximately eleven months after the … also indicated his disagreement with prior court determinations that plaintiff did not commit a fraud or …
- JEFFREY ANDERSEN VS. SHERYL ANDERSEN (FM-11-0919-10, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… County from July 2014 to the present involving her three children with plaintiff Jeffrey Andersen: Justin, Jason, and … custody, parenting time, equitable distribution, child support, and alimony dated March 21, 2011, was incorporated … and thereafter." 11 A-3631-20 "The UCCJEA governs the determination of subject matter jurisdiction in interstate, as …
- A-3631-20 - JEFFREY ANDERSEN VS. SHERYL ANDERSEN (FM-11-0919-10, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… County from July 2014 to the present involving her three children with plaintiff Jeffrey Andersen: Justin, Jason, and … custody, parenting time, equitable distribution, child support, and alimony dated March 21, 2011, was incorporated … and thereafter." 11 A-3631-20 "The UCCJEA governs the determination of subject matter jurisdiction in interstate, as …
- MICHELLE RUTKOWSKI VS. MARIO REYES (FD-16-1668-03, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… Family Part order denying his motion to reduce his unpaid child support balance by making a modification of NOT FOR … produced] was a motion for discharge or elimination, termination of the child support obligation . . . ." In …
- A-3339-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Family Part order denying his motion to reduce his unpaid child support balance by making a modification of NOT FOR … produced] was a motion for discharge or elimination, termination of the child support obligation . . . ." In …
- njcourts.gov… father, M.P., for weekly lunches, and for not having the child treated by an approved provider. L.P. also challenges the trial court's award of child support which the court entered without considering … must articulate reasons for custody and parenting time determinations and refer specifically to the pertinent …
- A-3783-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… father, M.P., for weekly lunches, and for not having the child treated by an approved provider. L.P. also challenges the trial court's award of child support which the court entered without considering … must articulate reasons for custody and parenting time determinations and refer specifically to the pertinent …
- njcourts.gov… client’s individual needs while offering opportunities and support that will help them avoid criminal behavior. … establish plans to meet their conditions of probation and support the successful completion of goals. … Adult …
- Appointment Of Court Appointed Special Advocate Rules of Courtnjcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court… Special Advocate 5:8C In any case in which the welfare of a child is in issue, the court may, on application of any … to undertake certain activities in furtherance of the child's interests, but who shall not supplant or interfere …
- njcourts.gov… subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment. In support of the motion, plaintiff presented a statement of … the light most favorable to plaintiff, there was evidence supporting plaintiff's claim defendants signed the … the issue depended upon a weighing of the evidence and a determination of the credibility of the parties' respective …
- GREGORY C. LUND VS. CAROLINE LUND (FM-12-0717-20, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… and defendant married in 1996. The parties have two adult children: Matthew and Tyler, born in 1999. Defendant and the … for divorce. He also filed a motion for pendente lite support. Defendant cross-moved for pendente lite support. In … only if the judge's "findings were mistaken," the "determination could not reasonably have been reached on …
- A-2943-21 – GREGORY C. LUND VS. CAROLINE LUND (FM-12-0717-20, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… and defendant married in 1996. The parties have two adult children: Matthew and Tyler, born in 1999. Defendant and the … for divorce. He also filed a motion for pendente lite support. Defendant cross-moved for pendente lite support. In … only if the judge's "findings were mistaken," the "determination could not reasonably have been reached on …
- njcourts.gov… the circumstances presented, the LAD protects a female child victim from sexual harassment stemming from child sex … any new evidence. She continued to adhere to her original determination for the same reasons expressed in her May 12, … her sex." Ibid. The Court also observed harassing conduct supporting a sexual harassment claim "need not be sexual in …