Filters
- A-5288-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… to compel plaintiff Donnalee Gillen to contribute to their children's college expenses. We affirm in part, and reverse … transfer of custody to defendant and terminating his child support obligation. In 2011, the parties' older son began … to offend the interests of justice." . . . Discretionary determinations, supported by the record, are examined to …
- Proceed Surgical Mesh/Proceed Ventral Patch Multi County Litigationnjcourts.gov… of the judiciary, as well as of the parties, would support a single MCL in which cases involving Proceed and …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0284-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to C.P.V., Jr. (the child). She challenges only whether termination will not do more harm than good. We affirm. I. … rights was in the best interests of the child and was supported by each prong of the four-prong test outlined in …
- A-0284-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0284-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to C.P.V., Jr. (the child). She challenges only whether termination will not do more harm than good. We affirm. I. … rights was in the best interests of the child and was supported by each prong of the four-prong test outlined in …
- When and By Whom Filed Rules of Courtnjcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court… N.J.S.A. 2A:4-30.124 to 2A:4-30.201, a summary action for support may be brought by either the party entitled thereto, … agency or a party seeking to establish that party's support obligation provided no other family action is pending in which the issue of support has been or could be raised. Note: Source-new. …
- Forms Rules of Courtnjcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court… with R. 5:12-4(i), notice shall be provided of all Child Placement Review Board proceedings to the foster parent or other temporary caregiver with whom each child is placed informing such person of the schedule for …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5526-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the trial court approved the Division's permanency plan of termination of L.R.P.'s parental rights, followed by … and of J.A.T.-P. and the resource parent. Dr. Katz supported the Division's permanency plan for the termination …
- A-5526-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5526-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the trial court approved the Division's permanency plan of termination of L.R.P.'s parental rights, followed by … and of J.A.T.-P. and the resource parent. Dr. Katz supported the Division's permanency plan for the termination …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-3266-21 A-3268-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of Kara's parental rights to Nancy and Kate, and … The judge's written opinion also included detailed findings supporting his decision terminating Carl's parental rights …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-3266-21 A-3268-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of Kara's parental rights to Nancy and Kate, and … The judge's written opinion also included detailed findings supporting his decision terminating Carl's parental rights …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-1773-18T1 A-1774-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not present any evidence and supported the Division's application for guardianship. … with the well-settled legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a …
- A-1773-18T1/A-1774-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-1773-18T1 A-1774-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not present any evidence and supported the Division's application for guardianship. … with the well-settled legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4914-18T2 A-4968-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [JUDGE] ALSO FAILED TO PROPERLY CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. A. [The Division] Failed To … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
- A-4914-18T2/A-4968-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4914-18T2 A-4968-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [JUDGE] ALSO FAILED TO PROPERLY CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. A. [The Division] Failed To … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5272-17T2 A-5275-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … permanency plan, which had changed from reunification to termination of parental rights and adoption. The court noted … courts must defer to a trial judge's findings of fact if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
- A-5272-17T2/A-5275-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5272-17T2 A-5275-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … permanency plan, which had changed from reunification to termination of parental rights and adoption. The court noted … courts must defer to a trial judge's findings of fact if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3820-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE COURT DID NOT EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION. A. DCPP'S CARELESS APPROACH, RATHER THAN … findings by a Family Part judge are "binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, and 9 A-3820-19 credible …
- A-3820-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3820-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE COURT DID NOT EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION. A. DCPP'S CARELESS APPROACH, RATHER THAN … findings by a Family Part judge are "binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, and 9 A-3820-19 credible …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1643-15T4 A-1644-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … L. 2012, c. 16, effective June 29, 2012. 4 A-1643-15T4 termination of parental rights followed by foster home … their parental rights. They maintain the record does not support the judge's findings that the Division established …
- A-1643-15T4/A-1644-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1643-15T4 A-1644-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … L. 2012, c. 16, effective June 29, 2012. 4 A-1643-15T4 termination of parental rights followed by foster home … their parental rights. They maintain the record does not support the judge's findings that the Division established …