njcourts.gov
… leave employment on a specified date and the first employer terminates the individual before that date, the seven-day … 2 The Tribunal cited N.J.A.C. 12:17-9.1(e)(9) as supporting its conclusion. That regulation provides: "An … will commence from the specified date[,]" not the date of termination. N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(a). Obviously, the Legislature …
njcourts.gov
… and was himself the victim of sexual assault as a young child. He has been determined after a hearing by the Social … things, the prosecutor's written statement of reasons in support of waiver was incomplete, conclusory, and utilized … the revised 2016 statute. We do so to assure that such determinations are handled fairly by prosecutors and courts in …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0284-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to C.P.V., Jr. (the child). She challenges only whether termination will not do more harm than good. We affirm. I. … rights was in the best interests of the child and was supported by each prong of the four-prong test outlined in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0284-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to C.P.V., Jr. (the child). She challenges only whether termination will not do more harm than good. We affirm. I. … rights was in the best interests of the child and was supported by each prong of the four-prong test outlined in …
njcourts.gov
… (Rayna Elizabeth Kessler and Elizabeth Cate, on the brief). Child USA and Victims' Recovery Law Center, attorneys for … for Justice (NJAJ) to file amici curiae briefs, which support plaintiff's contentions. II. A court's ruling on … would not promote the doctrine's objectives of conclusive determinations, party fairness, and judicial economy and …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3266-21 A-3268-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of Kara's parental rights to Nancy and Kate, and … The judge's written opinion also included detailed findings supporting his decision terminating Carl's parental rights …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-3266-21 A-3268-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of Kara's parental rights to Nancy and Kate, and … The judge's written opinion also included detailed findings supporting his decision terminating Carl's parental rights …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5526-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the trial court approved the Division's permanency plan of termination of L.R.P.'s parental rights, followed by … and of J.A.T.-P. and the resource parent. Dr. Katz supported the Division's permanency plan for the termination …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5526-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the trial court approved the Division's permanency plan of termination of L.R.P.'s parental rights, followed by … and of J.A.T.-P. and the resource parent. Dr. Katz supported the Division's permanency plan for the termination …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4914-18T2 A-4968-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [JUDGE] ALSO FAILED TO PROPERLY CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. A. [The Division] Failed To … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4914-18T2 A-4968-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [JUDGE] ALSO FAILED TO PROPERLY CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. A. [The Division] Failed To … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-1773-18T1 A-1774-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not present any evidence and supported the Division's application for guardianship. … with the well-settled legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-1773-18T1 A-1774-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not present any evidence and supported the Division's application for guardianship. … with the well-settled legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a …
njcourts.gov
… plaintiff or others. The defendant might be ordered to pay child support or emergency funds. The defendant might be ordered …
njcourts.gov
… now or in the past Dating or dated in the past Having a child in common … What relationships are covered by the PDVA? …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5272-17T2 A-5275-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … permanency plan, which had changed from reunification to termination of parental rights and adoption. The court noted … courts must defer to a trial judge's findings of fact if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5272-17T2 A-5275-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … permanency plan, which had changed from reunification to termination of parental rights and adoption. The court noted … courts must defer to a trial judge's findings of fact if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3820-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE COURT DID NOT EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION. A. DCPP'S CARELESS APPROACH, RATHER THAN … findings by a Family Part judge are "binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, and 9 A-3820-19 credible …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3820-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE COURT DID NOT EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION. A. DCPP'S CARELESS APPROACH, RATHER THAN … findings by a Family Part judge are "binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, and 9 A-3820-19 credible …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1643-15T4 A-1644-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … L. 2012, c. 16, effective June 29, 2012. 4 A-1643-15T4 termination of parental rights followed by foster home … their parental rights. They maintain the record does not support the judge's findings that the Division established …