-
njcourts.gov
… series of post-judgment orders regarding the suspension and termination of alimony due from her ex-husband, defendant … were married in 1994 and divorced in 2014. Their two children were sixteen and eighteen when the divorce judgment … further responsible to pay $200 a month in child support, the parties having agreed to a downward …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3241-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … arguments, including that the court should not order a termination of her parental rights absent proof beyond 11 … parent. E.W. did not call witnesses. B.W.'s law guardian supported termination of E.W.'s parental rights. Dr. Wells …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3241-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … arguments, including that the court should not order a termination of her parental rights absent proof beyond 11 … parent. E.W. did not call witnesses. B.W.'s law guardian supported termination of E.W.'s parental rights. Dr. Wells …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4072-16T3 A-4073-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the judge's findings could have been more detailed and supported with specific references to the facts on which the … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4072-16T3 A-4073-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of the judge's findings could have been more detailed and supported with specific references to the facts on which the … D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 245 (2012). When considering termination of parental rights, the court focuses on the …
default
… DOCKET NOS. A-4892-16T4 A-4893-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … He also conceded he and Teresa were homeless and lacked a support system. Robert claimed he had not spoken to Pamela … changed Teresa's permanency goal from reunification to termination of parental rights followed by adoption, and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-4892-16T4 A-4893-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … He also conceded he and Teresa were homeless and lacked a support system. Robert claimed he had not spoken to Pamela … changed Teresa's permanency goal from reunification to termination of parental rights followed by adoption, and …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › rules of court
… actions in which the court finds that either the custody of children or parenting time issues, or both, are a genuine … the financial ability of the party to pay alimony or support or both, and the parties' homes, which shall be limited to a factual description of the home where the child will reside or visit, appropriate child safety …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4032-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … In May 2018, the court approved the Division's plan of termination of N.W.S.'s parental rights followed by … M.I.S. also did not present any testimony or evidence but supported the termination of N.W.S.'s parental rights. Judge …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4032-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … In May 2018, the court approved the Division's plan of termination of N.W.S.'s parental rights followed by … M.I.S. also did not present any testimony or evidence but supported the termination of N.W.S.'s parental rights. Judge …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4452-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … begin our discussion with the legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a … harm to them. The father did not provide paternal care or support for the children. Indeed, even though he was allowed …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4452-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … begin our discussion with the legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a … harm to them. The father did not provide paternal care or support for the children. Indeed, even though he was allowed …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2659-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian for the children participated and supported termination of parental rights. 5 A-2659-23 On April 15, …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2659-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian for the children participated and supported termination of parental rights. 5 A-2659-23 On April 15, …
njcourts.gov
… attorney. If the substitution is within the same firm, supporting documentation does not have to be uploaded. Filed …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1321-21 A-1588-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant/ … 4 A-1321-21 Division asked N.D. to identify any relative supports and referred her for another psychiatric screening, … and convincing evidence that prong one and prong two of the termination statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, were met as J.D.'s …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1321-21 A-1588-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant/ … 4 A-1321-21 Division asked N.D. to identify any relative supports and referred her for another psychiatric screening, … and convincing evidence that prong one and prong two of the termination statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, were met as J.D.'s …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2487-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Prong Three. (4) The Trial Court Erred When It Found That Termination Of Parental Rights Was In The Child's Best … & Fam. Servs. v. F.M., 211 N.J. 420, 451 (2012). Evidence supporting the first prong may also support the second prong …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2487-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Prong Three. (4) The Trial Court Erred When It Found That Termination Of Parental Rights Was In The Child's Best … & Fam. Servs. v. F.M., 211 N.J. 420, 451 (2012). Evidence supporting the first prong may also support the second prong …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4777-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … were terminated in other proceedings. We affirmed those terminations. See N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. … trial in 2012 involved Jill, Gary and Carrie. The record supported the trial court's finding that "T.M.T. has chronic …