Filters
- A-1218-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1218-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 1:38-3(d)(12). 2 Defendant E.S. (Mother) did not appeal the termination of her parental rights. 3 A-1218-18T1 the children. The Law Guardian for the children supports that plan, and joins the Division in urging us to …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3664-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … further erred in ruling there were no alternatives to termination. POINT [V] THE [JUDGE] ERRED IN RULING THAT [THE … A-3664-18T2 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
- A-3664-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3664-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … further erred in ruling there were no alternatives to termination. POINT [V] THE [JUDGE] ERRED IN RULING THAT [THE … A-3664-18T2 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4967-14T4 A-4968-14T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for the remainder of the trial." The judge found "no support" for Father's claim "that he made a request for the … courts should defer to the trial court's credibility determinations." N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. R.G., …
- A-4967-14T4/A-4968-14T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4967-14T4 A-4968-14T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for the remainder of the trial." The judge found "no support" for Father's claim "that he made a request for the … courts should defer to the trial court's credibility determinations." N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. R.G., …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3063-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … contends the Division failed to establish the criteria for termination of her parental rights codified in N.J.S.A. … defer to a trial judge's findings of fact 10 A-3063-16T1 if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
- A-3063-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3063-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … contends the Division failed to establish the criteria for termination of her parental rights codified in N.J.S.A. … defer to a trial judge's findings of fact 10 A-3063-16T1 if supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence in …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1026-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division and Nina's law guardian contend the judgment is supported by substantial, credible evidence in the record … or present any evidence. The law guardian supported termination of Lucy's parental rights. In addition to …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1026-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division and Nina's law guardian contend the judgment is supported by substantial, credible evidence in the record … or present any evidence. The law guardian supported termination of Lucy's parental rights. In addition to …
- A-1026-21 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1026-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division and Nina's law guardian contend the judgment is supported by substantial, credible evidence in the record … or present any evidence. The law guardian supported termination of Lucy's parental rights. In addition to …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4130-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [the Division] Failed to Present Sufficient Evidence to Support the Trial Court's Conclusion that the Division … with [D.C.]. D. The Trial Court's Conclusion that the Termination of Parental Rights Would Not Do More Harm than …
- A-4130-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4130-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [the Division] Failed to Present Sufficient Evidence to Support the Trial Court's Conclusion that the Division … with [D.C.]. D. The Trial Court's Conclusion that the Termination of Parental Rights Would Not Do More Harm than …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2698-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … harm her or A.G. The results of the evaluation clinically supported that Jesse had been sexually abused, physically … part of this prong, as there are no alternatives to the termination of . . . [J.G.'s] parental rights. . . . [I]t is …
- A-2698-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2698-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … harm her or A.G. The results of the evaluation clinically supported that Jesse had been sexually abused, physically … part of this prong, as there are no alternatives to the termination of . . . [J.G.'s] parental rights. . . . [I]t is …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1666-21 A-1997-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … each appeal from a January 20, 2022 order denying termination of parental rights of A.F.'s mother, defendant … parent, A.R.F. The Law Guardian presented no witnesses but supported termination. At trial, Ricaldi testified about the …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1666-21 A-1997-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … each appeal from a January 20, 2022 order denying termination of parental rights of A.F.'s mother, defendant … parent, A.R.F. The Law Guardian presented no witnesses but supported termination. At trial, Ricaldi testified about the …
- A-5437-14T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5437-14T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … with clear and convincing evidence the criteria for termination of his parental rights. We reject these … challenge the Division's evidence. The record does not support these claims. The record shows that defense counsel …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4777-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Guardian joins the Division in opposing the appeal. Heather supported termination in her trial testimony. Richard is neither …
- A-4777-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4777-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Guardian joins the Division in opposing the appeal. Heather supported termination in her trial testimony. Richard is neither …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2488-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … reasonable efforts to help and the court's consideration of termination alternatives, the judge noted "the Division … IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED DID NOT SUPPORT THE LOWER COURT'S CONCLUSION THAT DENNIS'[S] SAFETY, …