njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0714-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (quoting M.M., supra, 189 N.J. at 294-95). In some cases, termination of a parent's constitutionally protected … of the family court in terminating parental rights is supported by substantial credible evidence in the record. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0714-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (quoting M.M., supra, 189 N.J. at 294-95). In some cases, termination of a parent's constitutionally protected … of the family court in terminating parental rights is supported by substantial credible evidence in the record. …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2437-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2437-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3644-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applicable law, we are satisfied the evidence in the record supports the decision to terminate Theresa's parental rights … the trial court changed the permanency plan from KLG to termination of Theresa's parental rights. A nine-day trial …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3644-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applicable law, we are satisfied the evidence in the record supports the decision to terminate Theresa's parental rights … the trial court changed the permanency plan from KLG to termination of Theresa's parental rights. A nine-day trial …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4767-15T3 A-4768-15T3 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … this action and, after a four- day trial, secured the termination of Steven and Anna's parental rights to all … parental rights to Paul. Anna argues the evidence failed to support the judge's findings on all four statutory prongs. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4767-15T3 A-4768-15T3 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … this action and, after a four- day trial, secured the termination of Steven and Anna's parental rights to all … parental rights to Paul. Anna argues the evidence failed to support the judge's findings on all four statutory prongs. …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2071-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … with Father in the event they were permitted to adopt after termination of his parental rights. After trial, Judge … but on the many obstacles to providing a stable home and support for the children that Father failed to overcome …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2071-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … with Father in the event they were permitted to adopt after termination of his parental rights. After trial, Judge … but on the many obstacles to providing a stable home and support for the children that Father failed to overcome …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1950-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … proven the fourth prong of the best interest test—whether termination of parental rights would not do more harm than … Tamara contends there was insufficient credible evidence to support the trial court's findings under any of the four …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1950-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … proven the fourth prong of the best interest test—whether termination of parental rights would not do more harm than … Tamara contends there was insufficient credible evidence to support the trial court's findings under any of the four …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3506-21 A-3508-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights. I. The facts are fully … visitation for both Tom and Fara and referred them to support services for mental health, parenting classes, and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3506-21 A-3508-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights. I. The facts are fully … visitation for both Tom and Fara and referred them to support services for mental health, parenting classes, and …
default
… in February 2014. Defendant and plaintiff have three children but only the youngest child is unemancipated. The … Ira Ray (Ray). Defendant submitted a certification in support of his motion alleging plaintiff 3 A-2412-20 and Ray … 2A:34-23(n)). We will not disturb the Family Part judge's determination, unless we conclude: (1) the trial court failed …
-
njcourts.gov
… in February 2014. Defendant and plaintiff have three children but only the youngest child is unemancipated. The … Ira Ray (Ray). Defendant submitted a certification in support of his motion alleging plaintiff 3 A-2412-20 and Ray … 2A:34-23(n)). We will not disturb the Family Part judge's determination, unless we conclude: (1) the trial court failed …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5609-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE TRIAL JUDGE AND THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED AT TRIAL DID NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL CONCLUSION THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE BEST … C. DCPP DID NOT PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD AS REQUIRED BY …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5609-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE TRIAL JUDGE AND THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED AT TRIAL DID NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL CONCLUSION THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE BEST … C. DCPP DID NOT PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD AS REQUIRED BY …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1157-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Fam. Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 3 To secure parental termination, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division to … written opinion. Arguing against the proofs that support the first prong, Ed contends he did not harm Alan. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1157-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Fam. Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 3 To secure parental termination, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) requires the Division to … written opinion. Arguing against the proofs that support the first prong, Ed contends he did not harm Alan. …