njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4943-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for them, and said he lacked income because he paid support for six children. Defendant did not know how he … that [he’d] always envisioned." The court concluded that termination of defendant's parental rights would not do more …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4943-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for them, and said he lacked income because he paid support for six children. Defendant did not know how he … that [he’d] always envisioned." The court concluded that termination of defendant's parental rights would not do more …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1837-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division satisfied its burden to explore alternatives to termination, and fourth prong, whether termination of … in favor of the guardianship petition overwhelmingly supports the judge's decision to terminate Adam's parental …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1837-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division satisfied its burden to explore alternatives to termination, and fourth prong, whether termination of … in favor of the guardianship petition overwhelmingly supports the judge's decision to terminate Adam's parental …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5165-14T2 A-5169-14T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … J.A. said he would not be able to attend because he has to support the family. The Division then changed its permanency plan to termination of parental rights followed by adoption. In …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2469-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … because the trial court correctly applied the law and supported its legal conclusions with adequate, substantial … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2469-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … because the trial court correctly applied the law and supported its legal conclusions with adequate, substantial … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5488-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … See N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a). The court ordered the termination of Alice's parental rights, and Alice does not … the facts and circumstances establishing the numerous bases supporting the termination of Alice's parental rights to …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5488-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … See N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a). The court ordered the termination of Alice's parental rights, and Alice does not … the facts and circumstances establishing the numerous bases supporting the termination of Alice's parental rights to …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2924-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, joins the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2924-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, joins the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3545-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … as did Mother. DCPP referred Mother to Ascenda Parent Support Services, but she was discharged in March 2023 after … 2023, DCPP filed a complaint in the Family Part seeking termination of Mother and Father's parental rights and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3545-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … as did Mother. DCPP referred Mother to Ascenda Parent Support Services, but she was discharged in March 2023 after … 2023, DCPP filed a complaint in the Family Part seeking termination of Mother and Father's parental rights and …
njcourts.gov
… NOS. A-1787-21 A-1788-21 A-2673-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M. … She planned to get a part-time job and rely on Jeff for support as well, including having him watch the children. … 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence, and termination of Morgan and Jeff's parental rights was in …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOS. A-1787-21 A-1788-21 A-2673-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M. … She planned to get a part-time job and rely on Jeff for support as well, including having him watch the children. … 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence, and termination of Morgan and Jeff's parental rights was in …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1066-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the order terminating his parental rights. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1066-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the order terminating his parental rights. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5191-17T4 A-5192-17T41 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … protect Hope. Tanya and Malcolm testified in opposition to termination of their parental rights. The trial court's judgment terminating parental rights was supported by substantial credible evidence and satisfied …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-5191-17T4 A-5192-17T41 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … protect Hope. Tanya and Malcolm testified in opposition to termination of their parental rights. The trial court's judgment terminating parental rights was supported by substantial credible evidence and satisfied …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1706-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the parental rights of Sarah and Greg to Ivan. In support of the judgment, the trial judge issued a … Division satisfied its burden to explore alternatives to termination, and the fourth prong, whether termination of …