Filters
- A-1103-19T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1103-19T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in the underlying litigation and is not appealing the termination of her parental rights. 3 A-1103-19T4 that … ineffective assistance of counsel. The Law Guardian supported termination during the trial and, on appeal, joins …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4591-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Permanency (Division) and Robert's Law Guardian support the judgment. Defendant raises the following … history of the Division's involvement leading to the termination of defendant's parental rights. We briefly …
- A-4591-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4591-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Permanency (Division) and Robert's Law Guardian support the judgment. Defendant raises the following … history of the Division's involvement leading to the termination of defendant's parental rights. We briefly …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2388-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … but defendant himself was not. No testimony regarding termination of defendant's parental rights was taken during … of services in prison, there was no other evidence supporting his claim. 10 A-2388-17T4 The case worker also …
- A-2388-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2388-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … but defendant himself was not. No testimony regarding termination of defendant's parental rights was taken during … of services in prison, there was no other evidence supporting his claim. 10 A-2388-17T4 The case worker also …
- A-44-22 Opinionnjcourts.gov… may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. D.C.A. (A-44-22) (087604) … prong of the best interests test, but not in the court’s determination of the other prongs of the test. Ultimately, the … interests of Ignacio, Josefina, Antonia, and Ian are amply supported by substantial and credible evidence. The court’s …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4164-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in the children's presence and parents as a factor in a termination of parental rights case. N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a) … findings underlying the trial court's decision if they are supported by "adequate, substantial, and credible evidence" …
- A-4164-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4164-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in the children's presence and parents as a factor in a termination of parental rights case. N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a) … findings underlying the trial court's decision if they are supported by "adequate, substantial, and credible evidence" …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1599-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in favor of the guardianship petition overwhelmingly supports the decision to terminate defendant's parental … oral decision. We add the following comments. To obtain termination of parental rights, the Division must satisfy …
- A-1599-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1599-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in favor of the guardianship petition overwhelmingly supports the decision to terminate defendant's parental … oral decision. We add the following comments. To obtain termination of parental rights, the Division must satisfy …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1653-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE DECISION TO TERMINATE L.C.'S PARENTAL RIGHTS WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT CREDIBLE EVIDENCE. [A.] PRONGS ONE & … EFFORTS" []INCLUDING AN INQUIRY INTO ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION. [C.] PRONG FOUR: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN …
- A-1653-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1653-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE DECISION TO TERMINATE L.C.'S PARENTAL RIGHTS WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT CREDIBLE EVIDENCE. [A.] PRONGS ONE & … EFFORTS" []INCLUDING AN INQUIRY INTO ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION. [C.] PRONG FOUR: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0751-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … visitation by Linda in place. She appeals from the termination of this Title 30 care and supervision … rights were violated. The Division and the Law Guardian support the termination of the litigation. Defendant Z.P. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0751-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … visitation by Linda in place. She appeals from the termination of this Title 30 care and supervision … rights were violated. The Division and the Law Guardian support the termination of the litigation. Defendant Z.P. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4139-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANACY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … S.O. (Sally), Alicia's mother, does not appeal the termination of her parental rights. 3 A-4139-23 involved … making . . . ." Further, Paolillo opined that Alex needs support to meet his own needs so supporting Alicia "exceeds …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4139-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANACY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … S.O. (Sally), Alicia's mother, does not appeal the termination of her parental rights. 3 A-4139-23 involved … making . . . ." Further, Paolillo opined that Alex needs support to meet his own needs so supporting Alicia "exceeds …
- njcourts.gov… We affirm. I. The parties were married in 1990 and two children were born of the marriage, a son born in 1997 and a … his employer. The FJOD also requires defendant to pay child support in the amount of $154 per week. 1 We use initials to … 2006). "[S]uch matters are committed to the discretionary determinations of the Family Part judges, based upon their …
- A-5071-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… We affirm. I. The parties were married in 1990 and two children were born of the marriage, a son born in 1997 and a … his employer. The FJOD also requires defendant to pay child support in the amount of $154 per week. 1 We use initials to … 2006). "[S]uch matters are committed to the discretionary determinations of the Family Part judges, based upon their …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4047-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- A-4047-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4047-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …