Filters
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1418-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1418-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4461-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the court approved the Division's permanency plan for "termination of parental rights followed by adoption." The … 2) "provide independent housing or a steady income to support [Mark]"; and 3) "serve as an appropriate role model …
- A-4461-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4461-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the court approved the Division's permanency plan for "termination of parental rights followed by adoption." The … 2) "provide independent housing or a steady income to support [Mark]"; and 3) "serve as an appropriate role model …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5880-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 1901-1963. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. We affirm. The Division presented … his last sentencing in October 2016. Two weeks before the termination hearing, Walt tested positive for marijuana. The …
- A-5880-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5880-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 1901-1963. The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. We affirm. The Division presented … his last sentencing in October 2016. Two weeks before the termination hearing, Walt tested positive for marijuana. The …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-0606-24 A-0607-24 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … resulting in the entry of default against him and termination of his parental rights to Ed. Nor did Steve … We will uphold a trial judge's fact-findings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-0606-24 A-0607-24 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … resulting in the entry of default against him and termination of his parental rights to Ed. Nor did Steve … We will uphold a trial judge's fact-findings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4865-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for trial, nor presented witnesses, and the law guardian supported the entry of a judgment of guardianship and … A.N.M. with her parents and explored alternatives to a termination of parental rights. In this regard, the judge …
- A-4865-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4865-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for trial, nor presented witnesses, and the law guardian supported the entry of a judgment of guardianship and … A.N.M. with her parents and explored alternatives to a termination of parental rights. In this regard, the judge …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0967-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE GUARDIANSHIP TRIAL THAT THERE WERE NO ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AND THAT TERMINATION OF … to raising the children on her own. In fact, the evidence supported a conclusion that she could only safely parent the …
- A-0967-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0967-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE GUARDIANSHIP TRIAL THAT THERE WERE NO ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AND THAT TERMINATION OF … to raising the children on her own. In fact, the evidence supported a conclusion that she could only safely parent the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3704-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … from an April 11, 2019 guardianship judgment, ordering the termination of her parental rights to her sons, A.Y.M. … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the judge's determination that was based primarily …
- A-3704-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3704-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … from an April 11, 2019 guardianship judgment, ordering the termination of her parental rights to her sons, A.Y.M. … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the judge's determination that was based primarily …
- njcourts.gov… of the Civil Service Commission (Commission) upholding her termination from the position of Human Services Specialist … the County's Division of Social Services (Division) in the child support and paternity unit. The Division assists clients …
- njcourts.gov… of the Civil Service Commission (Commission) upholding her termination from the position of Human Services Specialist … the County's Division of Social Services (Division) in the child support and paternity unit. The Division assists clients …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4823-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- A-4823-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4823-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- A-1774-19/A-1857-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1774-19 A-1857-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … characterize as their recreational use of marijuana. To support this argument, the parents refer to the public … proof the four statutory prongs necessary to enable the termination of their rights. Apart from the marijuana issue, …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-0399-21 A-0400-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …