-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2352-22 CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEVEN RADA, EMR PROXY FLOORING CORP., and RICHARD KLEIN, Defendants-Respondents. ______________________________ Submitted December 18, 2024 – …
default
… award to PERC and may, in turn, appeal PERC's final decisions to this court. N.J.S.A. 34:13A-16(f)(5)(a). Our review of "PERC decisions reviewing arbitration is sensitive, circumspect … aff'd o.b., 177 N.J. 560 (2003). We will uphold these decisions unless they are "clearly arbitrary or capricious." …
default
… representation. Both trial and appellate counsel may make decisions in the lens of hindsight that were debatable or … Ibid. The proper test is whether counsel's advice and decisions were within the range of competence required of …
default
… at Anne Klein Forensic Center, appeals from final agency decisions of the Department of Human Services, Office of … of Health removing petitioner from his position.1 As both decisions are amply supported by the credible evidence in … terminated his employment. Petitioner challenged those decisions and they were referred to the OAL, which conducted …
-
njcourts.gov
… at Anne Klein Forensic Center, appeals from final agency decisions of the Department of Human Services, Office of … of Health removing petitioner from his position.1 As both decisions are amply supported by the credible evidence in … terminated his employment. Petitioner challenged those decisions and they were referred to the OAL, which conducted …
-
njcourts.gov
… award to PERC and may, in turn, appeal PERC's final decisions to this court. N.J.S.A. 34:13A-16(f)(5)(a). Our review of "PERC decisions reviewing arbitration is sensitive, circumspect … aff'd o.b., 177 N.J. 560 (2003). We will uphold these decisions unless they are "clearly arbitrary or capricious." …
-
njcourts.gov
… representation. Both trial and appellate counsel may make decisions in the lens of hindsight that were debatable or … Ibid. The proper test is whether counsel's advice and decisions were within the range of competence required of …
default
… Off., 233 N.J. 330, 339 (2018)). Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions …
njcourts.gov
… of plaintiff's appearance of impropriety claim in our prior decisions because the claim had not been addressed by the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Off., 233 N.J. 330, 339 (2018)). Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions …
-
njcourts.gov
… of plaintiff's appearance of impropriety claim in our prior decisions because the claim had not been addressed by the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1695-18T3 MITT KISHAN, LLC d/b/a SHAYONA PHARMACY and RITA PATEL, Appellants, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted October 26, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5324-18T2 R.M., Petitioner, v. SOMERSET COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted November 5, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Firko. On appeal …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1823-19T4 IN THE MATTER OF JERSEY CITY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, INC., LOCAL 245, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY and NEW JERSEY PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3729-23 SUSAN J. CARNEY, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and BTL INDUSTRIES INC., Respondents. _____________________________ Submitted November 5, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0526-24 DONNA COBIANCHI, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and FF DRYWALL, INC., Respondents. ______________________________ Submitted November 18, …
njcourts.gov
… only on his murder conviction. This court's review of final decisions by a state administrative agency is limited. In re …
njcourts.gov
… Locurto, 157 N.J. 463, 471 (1999)). Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions …
njcourts.gov
… 368 N.J. Super. 175, 179 (App. Div. 2004). "Parole Board decisions are highly individualized discretionary …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3382-15T3 MARJORIE JONES, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARKETREACH, INC., Respondent. _______________________________________ Submitted June 1, 2017 – Decided Before …