-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4382-17T4 DOROTHY MOORE, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and BERGEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LP, Respondents. __________________________ Submitted October 17, 2019 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… the above standards, we discern no reason to disturb the decisions of the trial court or the Board and affirm …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4178-19 IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, Respondent-Respondent, and AAUP – BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES OF NEW JERSEY, Respondent-Respondent, and ESTATE OF DR. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0071-23 MAGDOULEN A. SAWIRES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Defendants-Respondents. …
-
njcourts.gov
… not supported by substantial 2 Chisolm does not appeal the decisions regarding the *.306 and *.554 charges. 5 A-3098-20 …
default
… award to PERC and may, in turn, appeal PERC's final decisions to this court. N.J.S.A. 34:13A-16(f)(5)(a). Our review of "PERC decisions reviewing arbitration is sensitive, circumspect … aff'd o.b., 177 N.J. 560 (2003). We will uphold these decisions unless they are "clearly arbitrary or capricious." …
default
… representation. Both trial and appellate counsel may make decisions in the lens of hindsight that were debatable or … Ibid. The proper test is whether counsel's advice and decisions were within the range of competence required of …
default
… at Anne Klein Forensic Center, appeals from final agency decisions of the Department of Human Services, Office of … of Health removing petitioner from his position.1 As both decisions are amply supported by the credible evidence in … terminated his employment. Petitioner challenged those decisions and they were referred to the OAL, which conducted …
-
njcourts.gov
… at Anne Klein Forensic Center, appeals from final agency decisions of the Department of Human Services, Office of … of Health removing petitioner from his position.1 As both decisions are amply supported by the credible evidence in … terminated his employment. Petitioner challenged those decisions and they were referred to the OAL, which conducted …
-
njcourts.gov
… award to PERC and may, in turn, appeal PERC's final decisions to this court. N.J.S.A. 34:13A-16(f)(5)(a). Our review of "PERC decisions reviewing arbitration is sensitive, circumspect … aff'd o.b., 177 N.J. 560 (2003). We will uphold these decisions unless they are "clearly arbitrary or capricious." …
-
njcourts.gov
… representation. Both trial and appellate counsel may make decisions in the lens of hindsight that were debatable or … Ibid. The proper test is whether counsel's advice and decisions were within the range of competence required of …
-
A-25-25 Petitioner's Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… of the 2019 Statute, this Court issued many significant decisions construing and applying the common law public … Avenue, 185 N.J. at 59-60. The Matthews and Raleigh Avenue decisions reflect the state of Public Trust Doctrine in New … Division has plenary authority over (as here) the final decisions of state agencies. See R. 2:2-3(a)(2). Second , …
njcourts.gov
… in parole matters. Our standard of review of the Board's decisions is limited, and "grounded in strong public policy … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2352-22 CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEVEN RADA, EMR PROXY FLOORING CORP., and RICHARD KLEIN, Defendants-Respondents. ______________________________ Submitted December 18, 2024 – …
default
… 2:11-3(e)(1). As the judge who rendered both Law Division decisions noted, reconsideration is governed by Rule 4:49-2. … Such motions must specify "the matters or controlling decisions which [the movant] believes the court has … 288 (App. Div. 2010) (citation omitted). We review those decisions to determine whether an abuse of discretion has …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1614-18T3 ZION'ELIYAH YAH'TORAH, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. Submitted May 12, 2020 – Decided May 26, 2020 Before Judges Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1614-18T3 ZION'ELIYAH YAH'TORAH, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. Submitted May 12, 2020 – Decided May 26, 2020 Before Judges Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2:11-3(e)(1). As the judge who rendered both Law Division decisions noted, reconsideration is governed by Rule 4:49-2. … Such motions must specify "the matters or controlling decisions which [the movant] believes the court has … 288 (App. Div. 2010) (citation omitted). We review those decisions to determine whether an abuse of discretion has …
-
njcourts.gov
… in parole matters. Our standard of review of the Board's decisions is limited, and "grounded in strong public policy … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2352-22 CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEVEN RADA, EMR PROXY FLOORING CORP., and RICHARD KLEIN, Defendants-Respondents. ______________________________ Submitted December 18, 2024 – …