-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0091-18T2 CITY OF ORANGE FIRE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION FMBA LOCAL 210, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF ORANGE TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted February 26, 2019 – Decided April 25, 2019 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2497-14T4 IN THE MATTER OF TIMOTHY LONDON AND EDMUND JOHNSON, CITY OF TRENTON. Submitted March 22, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Carroll. On appeal from the Civil Service …
-
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
… the basis for their imposition of a 144-month FET. The decisions of those entities provide detailed explanations …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1493-23 ROBERT GRONE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ Argued March 10, 2025 – Decided May 1, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 290 (App. Div. 2019) (noting deference to administrative decisions "largely emanates from our appreciation of the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1008-21 JULIO CAMACHO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Submitted March 27, 2023 – Decided …
default
… argued that Anderson did not have the authority to make any decisions about rent because the Jersey City MC does not … 2) Anderson did not have authority to make any rent decisions as an Alternate RLA; and 3) the trial judge erred … 552, 662 (App. Div. 2004). Generally, courts afford the decisions of municipal boards substantial deference; the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3167-18T3 LAUREN COOKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued telephonically March 23, 2020 – …
njcourts.gov
… complaint. 3 A-1793-23 reason to disturb the court's decisions on summary judgment and reconsideration. Nor are … ensuing litigation in Maryland are detailed in the written decisions of the federal district court judge in Farmer v. … plaintiff provided non-legal services to Marsh. Citing our decisions in Tara Enterprises, Inc. v. Daribar Management …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2570-22 IN THE MATTER OF DENIAL OF THIRD PARTY HEARING REQUEST OF P.T. JIBSAIL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FILE NO. 1515-06-0012.1 WFD 170001; WFD 180001; OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS FILE NO. 19-06. …
njcourts.gov
… 3.3 provides: "The parties understand and define major decisions as all decisions of significance regarding the education, health, … parties shall have the obligation to confer regarding such decisions." Article IV, paragraph 4.6 states: "The parties …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0036-23 MAGNETEK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, PHARMACIA, LLC, f/k/a MONSANTO, and SOLUTIA, INC., Defendants-Respondents. __________________________ Argued October 17, 2024 – …
njcourts.gov
… "[C]ourts ordinarily should not disturb the discretionary decisions of local boards that are supported by substantial …
njcourts.gov
… violates the CSPA because it allows the SOSD to make final decisions as to the students who will be permitted to enroll … districts the security of knowing that administrative decisions regarding the operation of the school cannot be …
-
njcourts.gov
… argued that Anderson did not have the authority to make any decisions about rent because the Jersey City MC does not … 2) Anderson did not have authority to make any rent decisions as an Alternate RLA; and 3) the trial judge erred … 552, 662 (App. Div. 2004). Generally, courts afford the decisions of municipal boards substantial deference; the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3167-18T3 LAUREN COOKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued telephonically March 23, 2020 – …
-
njcourts.gov
… violates the CSPA because it allows the SOSD to make final decisions as to the students who will be permitted to enroll … districts the security of knowing that administrative decisions regarding the operation of the school cannot be …
-
njcourts.gov
… complaint. 3 A-1793-23 reason to disturb the court's decisions on summary judgment and reconsideration. Nor are … ensuing litigation in Maryland are detailed in the written decisions of the federal district court judge in Farmer v. … plaintiff provided non-legal services to Marsh. Citing our decisions in Tara Enterprises, Inc. v. Daribar Management …
-
njcourts.gov
… that operates to generate "independent" recommendations or decisions. AI Lifecycle The full process and steps by which … or model that facilitates, recommends, or influences human decisions or outcomes. The distinction between recommending … driverless cars and aerial drones that can operate and make decisions with little or no human control. Such systems …