-
njcourts.gov
… 3.3 provides: "The parties understand and define major decisions as all decisions of significance regarding the education, health, … parties shall have the obligation to confer regarding such decisions." Article IV, paragraph 4.6 states: "The parties …
njcourts.gov
… 290 (App. Div. 2019) (noting deference to administrative decisions "largely emanates from our appreciation of the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1008-21 JULIO CAMACHO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Submitted March 27, 2023 – Decided …
njcourts.gov
… the basis for their imposition of a 144-month FET. The decisions of those entities provide detailed explanations …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0091-18T2 CITY OF ORANGE FIRE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION FMBA LOCAL 210, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF ORANGE TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted February 26, 2019 – Decided April 25, 2019 …
default
… 'a limited role' in the review of [administrative agency] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011) …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-5250-14T3 A-5328-14T3 CHRISTOPHER JAREMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, and MILDRED S. SCOTT, MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF, Defendants-Respondents. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2497-14T4 IN THE MATTER OF TIMOTHY LONDON AND EDMUND JOHNSON, CITY OF TRENTON. Submitted March 22, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Carroll. On appeal from the Civil Service …
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1493-23 ROBERT GRONE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ Argued March 10, 2025 – Decided May 1, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-5250-14T3 A-5328-14T3 CHRISTOPHER JAREMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, and MILDRED S. SCOTT, MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF, Defendants-Respondents. …
-
njcourts.gov
… 'a limited role' in the review of [administrative agency] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011) …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0091-18T2 CITY OF ORANGE FIRE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION FMBA LOCAL 210, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF ORANGE TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted February 26, 2019 – Decided April 25, 2019 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2497-14T4 IN THE MATTER OF TIMOTHY LONDON AND EDMUND JOHNSON, CITY OF TRENTON. Submitted March 22, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Carroll. On appeal from the Civil Service …
-
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
… the basis for their imposition of a 144-month FET. The decisions of those entities provide detailed explanations …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1493-23 ROBERT GRONE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ Argued March 10, 2025 – Decided May 1, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 290 (App. Div. 2019) (noting deference to administrative decisions "largely emanates from our appreciation of the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1008-21 JULIO CAMACHO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Submitted March 27, 2023 – Decided …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0526-24 DONNA COBIANCHI, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and FF DRYWALL, INC., Respondents. ______________________________ Submitted November 18, …