Filters
- A-1014-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARCUS K. FLETCHER (22-01-0024, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1014-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of CDS with intent to distribute within 1,000 feet of school property, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7(a), (counts three, six, … Thus, defendant asserts all the evidence seized should have been suppressed. "When reviewing a trial court's …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3804-21 EXPRESS BROKERAGE, d/b/a RAZA … found "it incredulous that an experienced broker would not have memorialized the terms of the agreement [specifying] … a company established for at least ten years would not have its own email. Additionally, the judge highlighted the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1217-20 TOMAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC, … different" and that had PVSC inquired, plaintiff could have explained that difference. As the judge aptly … grounds or otherwise affirm the judge's order. We have carefully considered plaintiff's contentions in view of …
- A-1217-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1217-20 TOMAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC, … different" and that had PVSC inquired, plaintiff could have explained that difference. As the judge aptly … grounds or otherwise affirm the judge's order. We have carefully considered plaintiff's contentions in view of …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3804-21 EXPRESS BROKERAGE, d/b/a RAZA … found "it incredulous that an experienced broker would not have memorialized the terms of the agreement [specifying] … a company established for at least ten years would not have its own email. Additionally, the judge highlighted the …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO: 000172-2017 Plaintiffs, : : vs. : : DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, : : : Defendant. : … (Tax 1998). “In practice, taxing authorities in New Jersey have never been estopped, either by their spoken words, … of the Division of Unemployment and Temporary Disability Insurance determined that Ms. Hopkins was not eligible for …
- 000172-2017 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO: 000172-2017 Plaintiffs, : : vs. : : DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, : : : Defendant. : … (Tax 1998). “In practice, taxing authorities in New Jersey have never been estopped, either by their spoken words, … of the Division of Unemployment and Temporary Disability Insurance determined that Ms. Hopkins was not eligible for …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3720-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of heroin with intent to distribute within 1000 feet of school property, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5(a) and N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7; … the evidence under Rule 404(b), because the jury might have inferred that defendant was the individual who N.D. …
- A-3720-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3720-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of heroin with intent to distribute within 1000 feet of school property, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5(a) and N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7; … the evidence under Rule 404(b), because the jury might have inferred that defendant was the individual who N.D. …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4770-18T3 JORGE E. CALVACHE and SHIRLEY … Enterprises with the summons and complaint. Plaintiffs have never made service on Peart, apparently because they have not located him. Plaintiffs took no further action …
- A-4770-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4770-18T3 JORGE E. CALVACHE and SHIRLEY … Enterprises with the summons and complaint. Plaintiffs have never made service on Peart, apparently because they have not located him. Plaintiffs took no further action …
- UNITED SERVICES INC. VS. CITY OF NEWARK (C-000221-18, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2007-20 UNITED SERVICES, INC., … application for a preliminary injunction finding he should have applied a more "flexible" approach to his consideration … the mayor and the City of "remov[ing] most or all Hispanic employees from significant leadership positions after coming …
- A-2007-20 – UNITED SERVICES INC. VS. CITY OF NEWARK (C-000221-18, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2007-20 UNITED SERVICES, INC., … application for a preliminary injunction finding he should have applied a more "flexible" approach to his consideration … the mayor and the City of "remov[ing] most or all Hispanic employees from significant leadership positions after coming …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1586-18T3 WILLIAM R. HIGGINS, … In early 2016, plaintiff discovered that defendant and two employees, Graff and Tejada, who are not parties to this … his paycheck when he wasn't even working for it." We have noted that "[a] party seeking to vacate an arbitration …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3192-19 CARROL McMORROW, … attorney, mayor, and council members did 5 A-3192-19 not have copies of the documents mentioned in item eight; one … compel compliance with OPRA by public officials, officers, employees and records custodians who might otherwise flout …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5573-14T1 JEFF CARTER, Appellant, v. … he filed in support of his claim and that it should have imposed a civil penalty on the District's legal counsel … compel compliance with OPRA by public officials, officers, employees and records 11 A-5573-14T1 custodians who might …
- A-3192-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3192-19 CARROL McMORROW, … attorney, mayor, and council members did 5 A-3192-19 not have copies of the documents mentioned in item eight; one … compel compliance with OPRA by public officials, officers, employees and records custodians who might otherwise flout …
- A-5573-14T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5573-14T1 JEFF CARTER, Appellant, v. … he filed in support of his claim and that it should have imposed a civil penalty on the District's legal counsel … compel compliance with OPRA by public officials, officers, employees and records 11 A-5573-14T1 custodians who might …
- A-1586-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1586-18T3 WILLIAM R. HIGGINS, … In early 2016, plaintiff discovered that defendant and two employees, Graff and Tejada, who are not parties to this … his paycheck when he wasn't even working for it." We have noted that "[a] party seeking to vacate an arbitration …
- Dealing in Stolen Property Chargesnjcourts.gov… a result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge” or equivalent terms have the same meaning. You must realize that knowledge is a … of the property at the time the defendant is alleged to have trafficked in, or initiated, organized, planned, … a result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge” or equivalent terms have the same meaning. You must realize that knowledge is a …