-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 6, 2025 – Decided June 11, 2025 Before Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … 07-09-0124. Jennifer N. Sellitti, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Amira R. Scurato, Designated Counsel, on the … of those three co- defendants would not have changed the outcome of the trial, given the 6 A-1283-23 "overwhelming" …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 26, 2023 – Decided November 3, 2023 Before Judges Gilson and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … No. 13-06-1545. Herlihy, Young & Niemiec, attorneys for appellant (Jeff Thakker, of counsel; Kevin E. Young, on … Bradley D. Billhimer, Ocean County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Samuel Marzarella, Chief Appellate Attorney, …
-
njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … personal and real property of a local exchange telephone company, defined as “a telecommunications carrier providing … relevant time period, including Verizon’s own documents, points only toward a geographical definition of a “local …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 30, 2024 – Decided February 10, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … in part. In September 2021, plaintiff filed a three-count complaint in the Law Division concerning real property … against plaintiff, and permitted defendants to answer the complaint.1 Defendants' answer and two-count counterclaim …
-
A-6-24 Appellate Division Amicus Curiae Brief Letter County Prosecutors Association of NJ
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… POINT I …………………………………………………………………...2 THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED NO ERROR BY DISMISSING PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT’S … as amicus curiae in support of respondents.2 The action before this Court challenges — as contrary to Article I, … NJ.gov (November 20, 2020), https://www.nj.gov/governor/news/news/562020/2020 1120b.shtml.] CPANJ, which is …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 29, 2024 – Decided June 3, 2024 Before Judges Marczyk and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … Defendant further asserted he had no intention of communicating with plaintiff, and there was no longer a need … the prior FRO trial transcript, wherein it found defendant committed harassment. Moreover, the court noted it had found …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 16, 2024 – Decided April 28, 2025 Before Judges Gummer and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior … se. Bradley D. Billhimer, Ocean County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (William Kyle Meighan, Supervising Assistant … N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(a)(1) to (2), second-degree conspiracy to commit murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2 and N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3, and two …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-0743-20 AAKASH DALAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, LLC, Defendant-Respondent. … Argued December 20, 2022 – Decided January 17, 2023 Before Judges Geiger and Fisher. On appeal from the Superior … This appeal followed. Plaintiff raises the following points on appeal: I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUS[LY] HELD THAT …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 1, 2023 – Decided March 14, 2023 Before Judges Enright and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … for the reasons set forth by Judge John A. Young in his comprehensive written opinion. I. In 2014, petitioner was … and pled guilty to count one, in exchange for the State's recommendation that he be sentenced to a thirty-year prison …
-
#07-91
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… Forms C Uniform Defendant Reporting System Directive #7-91 … D. Lipscher Administrative Director The Criminal Practice Committee, in its 1988-90 Report, recommended a package of … is the "foundation" report for each of the key decision points (Bail, PTI, PSI, etc.) of a case. Additional …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 4, 2023 – Decided October 27, 2023 Before Judges Currier and Susswein. On appeal from the … court record. Judge Guadagno issued an order and accompanying written opinion finding defendant guilty of DWI, … 382 (2015). 4 A-2836-21 "[T]he rule of deference is more compelling where . . . two lower courts have entered …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 19, 2023 – Decided January 17, 2024 Before Judges Rose and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … she "had forgot[ten] the gun was in [her] spare tires compartment so [she] put it in [her] book bag before … is a notarized statement and, under the circumstances, not competent evidence. It does not evince that it is under oath …
-
njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Rose’s opinion, 475 N.J. … years later, in June 2019, a grand jury indicted defendant for sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a child …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 8, 2024 – Decided January 12, 2024 Before Judges Sabatino and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … conviction by a jury of: second- degree conspiracy to commit armed robbery, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2 and 2C:15-1; first- … of reasonable diligence." Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT ONE – THE PCR COURT IMPROPERLY …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 22, 2025 – Decided January 6, 2026 Before Judges Smith and Jablonski. On appeal from the Superior … defendant argues we should extend the reasoning in State v. Comer, 249 N.J. 359 (2022), which granted certain juvenile … the right to resentencing. However, we decline to extend Comer to late adolescent offenders like defendant, and we …
-
njcourts.gov
… ## NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … years old, was employed as a bus driver for a private company that transports children with disabilities. Newark … guilty plea would only be vacated after successful completion of PTI. On January 7, 2025, defendant pleaded …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 3, 2026 – Decided March 4, 2026 Before Judges Rose and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … Monmouth County indictment with conspiracy to commit murder and related offenses for his part in a … November 3, 2023. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I AS THE WARRANTLESS …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 28, 2025 – Decided December 16, 2025 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … appeal, we affirm. I. On March 7, 2019, plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Law Division, seeking damages from Caesars … Atlantic City on September 16, 2018. In their first amended complaint, plaintiffs included counts in which they alleged …
njcourts.gov
… * NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS \TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Mala Sundar … such status does not excuse a non-response. The City points to the Chapter 91 request which stated in bold font … has been fully briefed, argued, and heard, and then to revisit a non-response issue by submitting supplemental …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 23, 2023 – Decided October 6, 2023 Before Judges Haas and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … factors seven, N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1(a)(7) ("[t]he defendant committed the offense pursuant to an agreement to either pay or be paid for the commission of the offense and the pecuniary incentive was …