njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0659-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant,1 v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … "[T]he trial court's factual findings should be upheld when supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0659-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant,1 v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … "[T]he trial court's factual findings should be upheld when supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1054-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and four of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The … of Dr. Lee, and noted that the doctor's testimony was supported by the various psychological evaluations of Kelly …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1054-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and four of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The … of Dr. Lee, and noted that the doctor's testimony was supported by the various psychological evaluations of Kelly …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1561-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Teresa of her right to an administrative review of that determination, but the record does not indicate she requested … Kirschner that he planned to get a steady job so he could support her and afford a home of his own to live with her on …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1561-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Teresa of her right to an administrative review of that determination, but the record does not indicate she requested … Kirschner that he planned to get a steady job so he could support her and afford a home of his own to live with her on …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1720-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … prongs of the best-interests standard necessary for the termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The … of Judge Axelrad's findings concerning the four prongs is supported by substantial, credible evidence. See N.J. Div. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1720-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … prongs of the best-interests standard necessary for the termination of parental rights. N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). The … of Judge Axelrad's findings concerning the four prongs is supported by substantial, credible evidence. See N.J. Div. …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3227-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Protection and Permanency (Division) presented its case for termination of defendants' parental rights to Andrea over a … not present clear and convincing evidence A-3227-18T3 4 to support the trial judge's findings that termination of her …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2449-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … which, in the best interest of the children, mandates termination of parental rights. In re Guardianship of … we are bound by his factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2449-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … which, in the best interest of the children, mandates termination of parental rights. In re Guardianship of … we are bound by his factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-4060-17T3 A-4061-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights to Gina. Defendants … we are convinced that Judge Axelrad's findings are amply supported by the trial testimony. Defendants never managed …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-4060-17T3 A-4061-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights to Gina. Defendants … we are convinced that Judge Axelrad's findings are amply supported by the trial testimony. Defendants never managed …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2158-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of Child Protection and Permanency's (Division) parental termination plan because there was no permanent placement … v. Silva, 394 N.J. Super. 270, 275 (2007) (noting case law supports the "proposition that facts that can be reasonably …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2297-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not "appropriately consider[]" "alternatives to termination and adoption," especially placement with … behavioral, and mental health problems. He did not support TPR because of the harm that would befall the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2297-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not "appropriately consider[]" "alternatives to termination and adoption," especially placement with … behavioral, and mental health problems. He did not support TPR because of the harm that would befall the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-4918-15T1 A-4923-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … appeal from the Family Part's June 30, 2016 order denying termination of parental rights following an extended … maintain appropriate housing. 10. [T.D.] may benefit from a support group for individuals who have been diagnosed with …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3124-19 A-3357-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights, substantially for the … visitation supervisor, the latter who notably did not support reunification, testifying that Mother had failed to …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-3124-19 A-3357-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights, substantially for the … visitation supervisor, the latter who notably did not support reunification, testifying that Mother had failed to …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2963-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … hearing, the court approved the Division's plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption by the … findings underlying the trial court's decision if they are supported by "'adequate, substantial and credible evidence' …