njcourts.gov
… taken from orders and judgments and not from opinions, oral decisions, informal written decisions, or reasons given for the ultimate conclusion." … tax sale certificate purchasers . . . than expressed in the decisions that preceded Cronecker." Id. at 272. Here, we are …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1934-21 CHRISTINA SEGURA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMRAN F. SHAH, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Argued January 10, 2023 – Decided April 27, 2023 Before Judges Gilson and Gummer. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1107-22 A.R., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. L.H.M.,1 Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Submitted December 18, 2023 – Decided February 1, 2024 Before Judges DeAlmeida …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1169-22 CARMEN CORZO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FRANCISCO CORZO, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted February 7, 2024 – Decided February 29, 2024 Before Judges Firko and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0484-21 RALPH NUNEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY COLLEGE, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Argued January 31, 2023 – Decided March 22, 2023 Before Judges Messano and …
njcourts.gov
A-3819-21 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3819-21 ROBERT D. BORTECK, PC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FREDERICK KENNEDY AND GABRIEL YANDOLI, CO- EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCIS P. KENNEDY, DECEASED, Defendants-Appellants. …
njcourts.gov
… including the parties' briefs and the judge's written decisions, never mention a Ferreira conference, which is why …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1091-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LUIS A. RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a FREDDIE, LUIS RODRIGUEZ, LUIS RODREQUEZ, LOUIS RODRIGUEZ, FREDDY RODRIGUEZ, FREDDIE RODRIGUEZ, …
njcourts.gov
… laches is whether a party has been harmed by the delay."). Decisions regarding application of the doctrine are reviewed …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1020-21 S.M., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.R.C., Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Argued March 8, 2023 – Decided June 22, 2023 Before Judges Mayer and Enright. On …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2031-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RAYMOND N. BOBEA, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Argued March 7, 2023 – Decided April 10, 2023 Before Judges Messano and Rose. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3783-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.S.-S.R., Defendant-Appellant, and M.M., Defendant. __________________________ IN THE …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2272-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANSUMANI KAMARA, a/k/a JOHN MONTANEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 18, 2024 – Decided April 12, 2024 Before …
njcourts.gov
… his findings and legal conclusions by stating he had "two decisions . . . to make," specifically, "whether …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0734-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JE.F.,1 Defendant, and JO.F., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ IN THE …
njcourts.gov
… the deference accorded to trial counsel in making strategic decisions, this court concludes first PCR counsel was not …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0682-22 BECKY LIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANLEY LIU, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Argued October 17, 2023 – Decided November 3, 2023 Before Judges Smith and Perez Friscia. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1865-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DIAAB SIDDIQ, a/k/a DIAAB M. SIDDIQ, MARSHALL C. DAVIS, MARSHALL E. DAVIS, KERRY A. SPROUSE, KERRY SPROUSE, MARSHALL DAVIS, and DIAAB MAHDI …
njcourts.gov
… For the same reasons, we reject defendant's reliance on our decisions in Forsythe v. Teledyne Turner Tube, 209 N.J. …
njcourts.gov
… and John's petitions in separate, well-reasoned written decisions finding neither defendant satisfied the two-part … in Judge Caulfield's cogent and well-reasoned written decisions. We add the following comments to amplify our decisions. The judge correctly found both John and Atkinson …