-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 29, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Hoffman. On appeal from the Superior … well as parole supervision for life, Megan's Law compliance, fines, and restitution. On October 4, 2011, … RENDERED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO COMMUNICATE, CONSULT, OR INVESTIGATE, ALL OF WHICH LED TO …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 5, 2018 – Decided July 6, 2018 Before Judges Hoffman and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … Adult Diagnostic Treatment Center, but found not to be a compulsive sex offender within the purview of the Sex … not directly appeal those convictions or sentences. After completing his prison term for the 2011 convictions, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 15, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Gooden Brown. On appeal from Superior … on his behalf, and how this would have altered the outcome of his trial." Therefore, the judge concluded that … a "probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome" of the proceeding. [State v. O'Neil, 219 N.J. 598, 611 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 4, 2020 – Decided March 17, 2020 Before Judges Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … set forth in Judge Carolyn A. Murray's March 25, 2019 comprehensive and cogent oral decision. The parties were … threatened to kill her on the morning of March 8. Her complaint also confirmed defendant had been arrested in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 18, 2020 – Decided July 7, 2020 Before Judges Sumners and Geiger. On appeal from the Superior … the record that [Schomp,] who testified regarding these points[,] was credible and straightforward in presenting … a refusal and, of course, we will require a knowing and competent refusal. The judge found there was probable cause …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 3, 2020 – Decided July 6, 2020 Before Judges Whipple and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … A. DEFICIENCY PRONG. 1. Trial Counsel failed to explain the Community Supervision for Life requirement to [d]efendant. … was sentenced to a term of ten years and placed on Community Supervision for Life (CSL). Defendant appealed and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 9, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … also argued trial counsel did not "properly investigate, communicate, prepare or explain his trial strategy and … The judge concluded that the plea judge "conducted a complete plea colloquy," where the "judge found that . . . …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted August 1, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … the documentation in the present appellate record is not comprehensive, it appears that defendant pled guilty in July … his present brief on appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE DEFENDANT SHOULD BE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 7, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Haas. On appeal from the New … status. In 2015, the SWSP Institutional Classification Committee (ICC)1 reviewed Eli's custody status and issued an … In reviewing those scales, the ICC must assess and assign points to the objective criteria. N.J.A.C. 10A:9-2.6(a). The …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 24, 2021 – Decided March 26, 2021 Before Judges Fuentes and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … sentence. The record shows that on June 27, 2010, defendant committed a robbery while armed with a wrench at the Grain … and rendered an oral decision on April 26, 2019. In its comprehensive oral decision, the PCR court noted that on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 4, 2021 – Decided March 18, 2021 Before Judges Hoffman and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … . as if someone had cleaned [the floor], as if someone had come in and wiped it down." Moreover, the pattern of … a landowner owes increasing care depending on whether the visitor is a trespasser, licensee or social guest or …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 15, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Currier. On appeal from the Superior … that counsel had coerced defendant not to testify. In a comprehensive oral decision issued on March 8, 2016, Judge … the petition was denied. Defendant presents the following points on appeal: POINT I: DEFENDANT WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 21, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Espinosa and Kennedy. On appeal from the … plea to an amended charge of third- degree conspiracy to commit aggravated assault, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2 and N.J.S.A. … Cronin conducted an evidentiary hearing and provided a comprehensive statement of reasons for denying the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Appellant. Submitted October 31, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Nugent. On appeal from the Superior … more time." Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE AFFIDAVIT IN … bin being located in the rear yard. The issue requires a common sense analysis. See State v. Evers, 175 N.J. 355, 385 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 11, 2018 – Decided October 29, 2018 Before Judges Nugent and Reisner. On appeal from Superior … or the appearance of bias, in the judge's decisions or comments on those issues. 6 A-0754-17T2 We have also closely … searched the transcripts for the allegedly inappropriate comments to which plaintiff adverts. We find nothing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 18, 2023 – Decided October 16, 2023 Before Judges Natali and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … interest." On July 31, 2020, plaintiff filed a verified complaint seeking possession of defendant's stock … a warrant of removal or writ of possession, unspecified compensatory damages, counsel fees and costs. Defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued August 1, 2023 – Decided September 7, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … double damages and interest on her security deposit for non-compliance with N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 of the Security Deposit Act … to the trial [judge who] heard the witnesses, sifted the competing evidence, and made reasoned conclusions." …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 20, 2026 – Decided February 27, 2026 Before Judges Walcott-Henderson and Bergman. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, CSC Docket No. 2024-1124. The Vigilante Law … CSC's final administrative action, arguing the following points: POINT I THE CSC WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS IN …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 3, 2026 – Decided February 27, 2026 Before Judges Gilson and Vinci. On appeal from the Superior … through the closed door. Defendant was telling B.S. to "come outside, come outside." B.S. exited the store and … II. 13 A-3707-23 On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration. POINT I [DEFENDANT] WAS DENIED …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 3, 2024 – Decided April 4, 2025 Before Judges Susswein, Perez Friscia and Bergman. On appeal … or eliminate the interception of such [non-relevant communications] by making reasonable efforts, whenever … history leading up to our remand order are set forth comprehensively in our prior opinion and need only be …