Filters
- A-1561-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1561-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Teresa of her right to an administrative review of that determination, but the record does not indicate she requested … Kirschner that he planned to get a steady job so he could support her and afford a home of his own to live with her on …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2963-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … hearing, the court approved the Division's plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption by the … findings underlying the trial court's decision if they are supported by "'adequate, substantial and credible evidence' …
- A-2963-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2963-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … hearing, the court approved the Division's plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption by the … findings underlying the trial court's decision if they are supported by "'adequate, substantial and credible evidence' …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2963-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … hearing, the court approved the Division's plan of termination of parental rights followed by adoption by the … findings underlying the trial court's decision if they are supported by "'adequate, substantial and credible evidence' …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4060-17T3 A-4061-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights to Gina. Defendants … we are convinced that Judge Axelrad's findings are amply supported by the trial testimony. Defendants never managed …
- A-4060-17T3/A-4061-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4060-17T3 A-4061-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights to Gina. Defendants … we are convinced that Judge Axelrad's findings are amply supported by the trial testimony. Defendants never managed …
- Appleby, Melanie D. - 2013-037 ACJC Casenjcourts.gov… had never been paying for the educational expenses of his children. However, it is admitted that the letter related to child support. 4. Respondent admits that she spoke about the Child … May 3, 2012 from Donohue wherein he requested 7. voluntary termination of his child support obligations ("Child Support …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3124-19 A-3357-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights, substantially for the … visitation supervisor, the latter who notably did not support reunification, testifying that Mother had failed to …
- A-3124-19/A-3357-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3124-19 A-3357-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights, substantially for the … visitation supervisor, the latter who notably did not support reunification, testifying that Mother had failed to …
- A-4918-15T1/A-4923-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4918-15T1 A-4923-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … appeal from the Family Part's June 30, 2016 order denying termination of parental rights following an extended … maintain appropriate housing. 10. [T.D.] may benefit from a support group for individuals who have been diagnosed with …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2297-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not "appropriately consider[]" "alternatives to termination and adoption," especially placement with … behavioral, and mental health problems. He did not support TPR because of the harm that would befall the …
- A-2297-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2297-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not "appropriately consider[]" "alternatives to termination and adoption," especially placement with … behavioral, and mental health problems. He did not support TPR because of the harm that would befall the …
- DEANA CALLAHAM VS. EDWARD CALLAHAM (FM-02-1444-11, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… 8, 2018 Family Part order, denying his motion to reduce his support NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE … of the former marital residence (FMR), and $690 per week in child support for the parties' three minor children until … and imputed an income to him of $72,000. That determination cannot be disturbed absent a showing of changed …
- A-5990-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… 8, 2018 Family Part order, denying his motion to reduce his support NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE … of the former marital residence (FMR), and $690 per week in child support for the parties' three minor children until … and imputed an income to him of $72,000. That determination cannot be disturbed absent a showing of changed …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2449-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … which, in the best interest of the children, mandates termination of parental rights. In re Guardianship of … we are bound by his factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
- A-2449-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2449-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … which, in the best interest of the children, mandates termination of parental rights. In re Guardianship of … we are bound by his factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1550-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … rights will ultimately benefit Chris because such a termination is his only chance to achieve permanency. In … the trial court's findings concerning the four prongs are supported by substantial credible evidence. See N.J. Div. of …
- A-1550-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1550-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … rights will ultimately benefit Chris because such a termination is his only chance to achieve permanency. In … the trial court's findings concerning the four prongs are supported by substantial credible evidence. See N.J. Div. of …
- A-17-17 Opinionnjcourts.gov… may not have been summarized. New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. R.L.M. and J.J. (A-17-17) … that the best interests of R.A.J. necessitated the termination of the parental rights of R.L.M. and J.J. An … did not reach the constitutional issues raised by D.Y. in support of his self - representation claim. D.Y., 218 N.J. …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-2506-23 A-2507-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … legal principles, and sufficient credible evidence supports the judge's findings. Therefore, we affirm. I. We … begin our discussion with the legal framework governing the termination of parental rights. Parents have a …