njcourts.gov
… of his guilty plea. On appeal, defendant raises two points: I. THE TRIAL COURT MISAPPLIED THE LAW IN DENYING THE … of January 8, 2015. We add only the following brief comments. On February 27, 2013, defendant pled guilty before … for entering these guilty pleas, the State agreed to recommend that defendant be sentenced on the two attempted …
njcourts.gov
… Thereafter, according to Otlowski, the CI successfully completed four purchases of drugs (controlled buys) from … Mullaney. Defendant's appellate arguments are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion, beyond the following brief comments. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). On this appeal, defendant argues …
njcourts.gov
… 161, 177 (1999), Judge DeCastro concluded that defendant committed wonton, intentional, and grossly negligent conduct … own medical condition.1 Defendant presents the following points of argument: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT … the record, defendant's appellate contentions are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. …
njcourts.gov
… reviewing the factual findings made in an unemployment compensation proceeding, the test is not whether an appellate court would come to the same conclusion if the original determination … Parsard's contentions and conclude they are without sufficient merit to warrant an extended discussion in a …
njcourts.gov
… denied defendant’s motion in a written opinion and accompanying order. The judge relied on this court’s opinion …
njcourts.gov
… of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition No. 2011-11138. Drazin & … limited. R. 1:36-3. January 29, 2020 2 A-3142-18T4 In this compensation matter, William Psiuk appeals an order of the … in light of Psiuk's argument, we conclude it is without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. …
njcourts.gov
… argued that "her trial counsel was ineffective for recommending a non-jury trial [and] for not asking the trial … "was under investigation by the 3 A-1105-17T1 Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct," she would not have agreed to …
default
… As part of the negotiated plea, the State agreed to recommend a sentence of twenty-six years in prison subject to …
njcourts.gov
… that would extend the Miller factors and 1 We decline to comment on the argument presented for the first time in … 2021, the Supreme Court granted certification in State v. Comer, A-42-20, which presents this issue: "Is N.J.S.A. …
njcourts.gov
… THE LATE FILING OF [DEFENDANT'S PCR PETITION]. We find insufficient merit in these arguments to warrant further … a written opinion, R. 2:11-3(e)(2), adding only a few brief comments about the third point. Although never previously …
-
njcourts.gov
… denied defendant’s motion in a written opinion and accompanying order. The judge relied on this court’s opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition No. 2011-11138. Drazin & … limited. R. 1:36-3. January 29, 2020 2 A-3142-18T4 In this compensation matter, William Psiuk appeals an order of the … in light of Psiuk's argument, we conclude it is without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. …
-
njcourts.gov
… 161, 177 (1999), Judge DeCastro concluded that defendant committed wonton, intentional, and grossly negligent conduct … own medical condition.1 Defendant presents the following points of argument: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT … the record, defendant's appellate contentions are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. …
-
njcourts.gov
… of his guilty plea. On appeal, defendant raises two points: I. THE TRIAL COURT MISAPPLIED THE LAW IN DENYING THE … of January 8, 2015. We add only the following brief comments. On February 27, 2013, defendant pled guilty before … for entering these guilty pleas, the State agreed to recommend that defendant be sentenced on the two attempted …
-
njcourts.gov
… Thereafter, according to Otlowski, the CI successfully completed four purchases of drugs (controlled buys) from … Mullaney. Defendant's appellate arguments are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion, beyond the following brief comments. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). On this appeal, defendant argues …
-
njcourts.gov
… provided contrasting requests for the ultimate outcome charge; and on post- verdict motions, argued that the ultimate outcome charge should not have been charged, and that any … counsel opposed plaintiff's motion making two primary points: the judge should enter a judgment of no cause of …
-
njcourts.gov
… and despite a denial of their motion to dismiss the complaint based upon lack of standing, they never had their … the Noels applied for and received a loan modification. Commencing on December 1, 2009, the Noels failed to make the … arguments raised by defendants, we find the arguments lack sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. …
-
njcourts.gov
… reviewing the factual findings made in an unemployment compensation proceeding, the test is not whether an appellate court would come to the same conclusion if the original determination … Parsard's contentions and conclude they are without sufficient merit to warrant an extended discussion in a …
-
njcourts.gov
… THE LATE FILING OF [DEFENDANT'S PCR PETITION]. We find insufficient merit in these arguments to warrant further … a written opinion, R. 2:11-3(e)(2), adding only a few brief comments about the third point. Although never previously …
-
njcourts.gov
… that would extend the Miller factors and 1 We decline to comment on the argument presented for the first time in … 2021, the Supreme Court granted certification in State v. Comer, A-42-20, which presents this issue: "Is N.J.S.A. …