-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0127-18T4 M.A., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES and HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondents-Respondents. ____________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5530-18T1 DIANE RAMOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________ Argued November 10, 2020 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3604-18T1 LUCILLE GABEL, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and THREE STAR TOURS, INC., Respondents. ______________________________ Submitted March 12, 2020 – Decided April 15, …
-
njcourts.gov
… view, subjective findings are not as useful in making decisions or diagnoses as are objective findings. Here, Dr. …
-
njcourts.gov
… N.J. 1, 9 (2009)). "Judicial review of the Parole Board's decisions is guided by the arbitrary and capricious standard … Bd., 224 N.J. 213, 222-23 (2016). Accordingly, the Board's decisions should be reversed "only if they are arbitrary and …
-
njcourts.gov
… 440, 443-44 (App. Div. 2006)). Our role in reviewing PERC decisions is "sensitive and circumspect." In re Hunterdon … Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 116 N.J. 322, 328 (1989). PERC decisions are "regulatory determination[s] of an …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5177-16T4 M.P., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES and OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES1, Respondents-Respondents. ___________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
… We have a limited role in reviewing administrative agency decisions. Brady v. Bd. of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 210 (1997). We will not overturn such decisions unless they are "arbitrary, capricious or … Generally, "in reviewing administrative agency decisions, we accord substantial deference to an agency …
-
njcourts.gov
… from the "[w]ide discretion afforded to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge." In …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3020-22 SEAN JONES, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. Submitted May 28, 2024 – Decided June 17, 2024 Before Judges Marczyk and Chase. On appeal from the New Jersey …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2891-21 ANGEL MENDEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ____________________________ Argued January 22, 2024 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1825-21 WILLINGBORO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, on behalf of member, MICHELLE N. REDDICK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WILLINGBORO, BURLINGTON COUNTY, …
-
njcourts.gov
… a distinct statutory scheme, N.J.S.A. 18A:6-17.1. Those two decisions by the arbitrator and the Board, according to the …
njcourts.gov
… parties' contract and determined it would make the final decisions itself. In so doing, the court ignored the … permit Gould to complete his work and make all the final decisions for which the parties authorized him to do so, …
njcourts.gov
… § 40-4.1 (2024) (noting generally "standing to appeal decisions taken at a municipal level [to be] consistent with …
njcourts.gov
… Director or staff, had "the authority to render final decisions on CMP compliance . . . in the coordinated … applying regulations allowing third-party appeals of permit decisions unless authorized by a federal or state statute. … which affords a right of appellate review of Commission decisions involving: 1) waivers of strict compliance and 2) …
njcourts.gov
… 9 A-1868-23 students. Dennis recalled that in making hiring decisions, "we wanted diversity, but at the same time we … should have been severed because they were based on decisions made by different decision-makers. The District … it that age and race discrimination played a role in those decisions. Given that there was sufficient evidence from …
njcourts.gov
… U.S. 133, 120 S. Ct. 2097, 147 L.Ed. 2d 105 (2000), and the decisions in Viscik v. Fowler Equip. Co. Inc. , 173 N.J . 1 … have no business telling [companies]…how to make personnel decisions’”), certif. denied, 152 N.J. 189 (1997); Fuentes … U.S. 133, 120 S. Ct. 2097, 147 L.Ed.2d 105 (2000), and the decisions in Viscik v. Fowler Equip. Co. Inc., 173 N.J. 1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Director or staff, had "the authority to render final decisions on CMP compliance . . . in the coordinated … applying regulations allowing third-party appeals of permit decisions unless authorized by a federal or state statute. … which affords a right of appellate review of Commission decisions involving: 1) waivers of strict compliance and 2) …
-
A-0970-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… 23 I. THIS COURT SHOULD REVERSE RESPONDENTS’ FINAL DECISIONS AS RESPONDENTS’ UNILATERAL ALTERATION OF THE … RATIO WAS ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS, OR UNREASONABLE (The decisions below are contained within appendix pages 1a-31a … Facts ........................ 24 II. RESPONDENTS’ FINAL DECISIONS MUST BE REVERSED AS THEY CLEARLY BREACHED THE …