njcourts.gov
… and final disposition through the avoidance of piecemeal decisions; (2) fairness to parties to the action and those …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1814-22 DEBRA FURPHY and ANDREW FURPHY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BAYSHORE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, GLORIA M. BORJA, RN, SATWAT KAUR, RN, LESLIE KOWAL, RN, SARA KRISTINSSON, RN, TAMARA KRAUSE, RN, …
njcourts.gov
… Super. at 182.] We "review[] the trial court's jury-related decisions under the abuse of discretion standard" because of … law," the juror should have been removed,'" a trial judge's decisions regarding jury management are entitled to …
njcourts.gov
… taken from orders and judgments and not from opinions, oral decisions, informal written decisions, or reasons given for the 32 A-2384-21 ultimate …
njcourts.gov
… were void, and that Thomas was "authorized to make all decisions concerning the operations and management of H&H." … non conveniens] is equitable in nature and, therefore, decisions concerning its application ordinarily are left to …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2471-22 CT07 SPII, LLC, and DT07 SPII, LLC, Plaintiffs-Respondents/ Cross-Appellants, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MONROE, Defendant-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, and TOWNSHIP …
njcourts.gov
… [We] . . . 17 A-1472-23 will set aside or modify such decisions if they do not comport with the applicable law or … comprising part of a process by which governmental decisions and policies are formulated." In re Liquidation of … independent discussion regarding contemplated policies and decisions." Id. at 85-86. The deliberative process privilege …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3079-22 PATERSON BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES, INC. and THOMAS MARTIN, Defendants-Respondents. Argued November 14, 2024 – Decided January 30, 2025 Before …
njcourts.gov
… us to reject defendants' arguments and affirm the judge's decisions. We affirm in all three matters. I. The underlying …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1104-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.P.R.,1 Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued May 14, 2024 – Decided July 1, 2024 Before Judges Firko and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1653-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DARWENS H. CADET, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued April 30, 2024 – Decided July 10, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and …
njcourts.gov
… we uphold the trial court and the Appellate Division decisions, which concluded that the officers’ seizure of the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0332-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BRIAN SHEPPARD, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted November 10, 2022 – Decided August 29, 2023 Before Judges Gooden …
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3379-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TYSHON M. NIEVES, a/k/a TYSHON NIEVES, Defendant-Appellant. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4098-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.M.S.,1 Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Submitted October 26, 2022 – Decided August 14, 2023 Before …
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the [c]ourt has overlooked … made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions that counsel believes the court has overlooked or … but] . . . is only to point out the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2490-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. T.L.C. ,1 Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted November 13, 2024 – Decided December 23, 2024 Before …
njcourts.gov
… we affirm the Appellate Division judgment. [Id. at 188]. Decisions following Davidson are in accord.7 For example, in … court follows the Appellate Division’s findings in those decisions that a settlement for 60 percent of the underlying …
njcourts.gov
… comprising part of a process by which governmental decisions and policies are formulated '") (quoting In re …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3708-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN P. RINCK, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Argued April 12, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli, Rothstadt and …