-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … court review." Mt. Hope Dev. Assocs. v. Mt. Hope Waterpower Project, L.P., 154 N.J. 141, 148 (1998). No such … Super. 463, 483 (App. Div. 2013). Dismissed. … a2477-15.pdf … A-2477-15T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … asserting numerous defenses, including the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to - 20 (CFA), and the … in entering judgment for plaintiff. Affirmed. … a3761-15.pdf … A-3761-15T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … her father's 2004 will, for which she and her sister were appointed administrators, "made several specific bequests of … to relief under Rule 4:50-1(f). Affirmed. … a4221-15.pdf … A-4221-15T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… County, Docket No. FM-12-1542-98. Jeney, Jeney & O'Connor, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Robert J. Jeney, Jr., … and his ex-wife to share equally the cost of a court-appointed forensic accountant. The court found that both … presented to support plaintiff's interpretation. … a4894-15.pdf … A-4894-15T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants, concluding that defendants did not breach a legal duty under … when surface conditions are dangerous. Affirmed. … a1515-16.pdf … A-1515-16T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Stephanis1 appeals from a December 19, 2016 order denying reconsideration of an October 28, 2016 order rejecting … motion for reconsideration. Affirmed. … a1949-16.pdf … A-1949-16T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and an April 13, 2017 order denying their motion for reconsideration of the March 3, 2017 order. In both rulings, … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a4094-16.pdf … A-4094-16T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the stabbing death of Kendal Anthony. In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court abused its discretion in … not reflect an abuse of discretion. Affirmed. … a4350-16.pdf … A-4350-16T6 …
-
njcourts.gov
… October 30, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Messano, O'Connor and Vernoia. On appeal from Superior Court of New … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. … a1183-15.pdf … A-1183-15T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Inc., (Tri-State) to inspect plaintiffs' home. Tri- State concluded a ruptured pipe underneath the first-floor … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a0345-16.pdf … A-0345-16T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… FRANCIS SCARDILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID INNACCONE and POOL TOWN, Defendants, and PM CONTRACTORS, Defendant-Respondent. … a summary judgment that has not been appealed. … a0847-16.pdf … A-0847-16T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … as plaintiff agreed in court to remove the signs at the conclusion of the Law Division case. 3 A-4503-15T1 On the … discussion. R. 2:11- 3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a4503-15.pdf … A-4503-15T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … with bodily harm, N.J.A.C. 10A:4-4.1(a)(2)(ii); *.306, conduct which disrupts or interferes with the security or … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a5360-15.pdf … A-5360-15T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … of law, we affirm. This case arises out of tragic facts. We consider these facts, and all reasonable inferences from … court's grant of summary judgment. Affirmed. … a5560-15.pdf … A-5560-15T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-1901-16T2 MICHAEL MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONIFER-LECHASE CONSTRUCTION, LLC, CONIFER REALTY, LLC, … defendants in the original complaint. Affirmed. … a1901-16.pdf … A-1901-16T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … of defendant's PTI application, we vacate the order concerning PTI and remand for further proceedings. Because … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0159-16.pdf … A-0159-16T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… from the February 23, 2016 Family Part order denying reconsideration of the court's October 8, 2014 and NOT FOR … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … discretion in denying reconsideration. Affirm. … a3805-15.pdf … A-3805-15T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … for her failure to file an answer and rejected her contention that plaintiff lacked standing. The court entered … R. 1:6-8, R. 4:43-1 and R. 4:64- 1(c). Affirmed. … a3483-15.pdf … A-3483-15T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … refer to the individuals in this case for the purposes of confidentiality and clarity. 3 A-4936-15T3 fist. She also … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a4936-15.pdf … A-4936-15T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … vehicle was a covered auto under the policy. Because we conclude the clear and unambiguous terms of the policy do … proceedings. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a3151-15.pdf … A-3151-15T4 …