-
njcourts.gov
… precedent or be binding upon any court." Unreported decisions "serve no precedential value, and cannot reliably …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0436-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DARREN E. RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Submitted October 20, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0374-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. IBILOLA IGHAMA-AMEGOR, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Argued January 6, 2020 – Remanded January 31, 2020 Reargued …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Legislature "intended to overturn recent 'palimony' decisions by New Jersey courts," specifically referencing … that the bill was "intended to overturn recent 'palimony' decisions by New Jersey courts." Ibid. (quoting Senate … was enacted by the Legislature in direct response to recent decisions that found implied in fact agreements. Roccamonte, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5488-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.H., Defendant, and D.L., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ IN THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:3-4. 31 A-0313-18T1 tactical decisions and possibly prejudicing defendant's chance of …
-
njcourts.gov
… 186 N.J. 286, 319 (2006). Thus, our review of evidentiary decisions implicates the abuse of discretion standard, where …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2432-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSE D. GRAHAM, a/k/a BOO GRAHAM, and JOSE DANIEL GRAHAM, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________________ Submitted April 9, 2018 …
-
njcourts.gov
… by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such an individual; or Such conduct has … employment, Perry, who A-4097-14T3 27 had authority to make decisions that adversely affected her employment, prevented … correctly applied the applicable standard and that its decisions to deny defendants' motions are unassailable. V. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3708-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN P. RINCK, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Argued April 12, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli, Rothstadt and …
-
njcourts.gov
… raises the following arguments: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT'S DECISIONS TO REMOVE JURORS AFTER SUBMISSION OF THE CASE WAS …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5319-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued October 30, 2018 – Decided May 15, 2019 Before Judges Geiger and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4970-16T1 FRED BONDA, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF ELIZABETH, Defendants-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, and ELIZABETH FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendant, v. CHRISTIAN BOLLWAGE, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5093-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. P.G., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5268-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.A., Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, and E.M., Defendant. …
-
njcourts.gov
… to include "a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or … or be binding upon any court." R. 1:36-3. Unreported decisions "serve no precedential value, and cannot reliably …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4452-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRAVIS T. HARTSFIELD, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ Argued April 19, 2018 – Decided April 15, 2019 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
… there are very important assumptions and very important decisions that you have to make . . . . You would have to …
-
njcourts.gov
… policy, because he did not appeal the final agency decisions or adequately deny the absences in his response to … policy, because he did not appeal the final agency decisions or adequately deny the absences in his response to … did not appeal the discipline when they became final agency decisions. In Winters, the Court concluded that an employee …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1722-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANTWAN J. HORTON, a/k/a ANATWAN HORTAN, ANTIONE JAMESON, ANTIONE JENKINS, ANTOINE SMITH, ANTOWNE HORTON, ANTWAN JACKSON, RASEEN WALLACE, …