-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1502-16T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________________ Argued March 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Mawla and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5155-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEIFFER BRYAN, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________________ Submitted December 12, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and …
-
njcourts.gov
… for the reasons expressed by the trial judge in her oral decisions. We add the following comments. 13 A-0153-20 Our …
-
njcourts.gov
… prerequisite for adequate appellate review of sentencing decisions . . . [in order to] determine whether the trial …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4366-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DANIEL GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted September 20, 2021 – Decided September 24, 2021 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4874-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NATHANIEL E. PRICE, a/k/a JOSH DURHAM, and JOSHUA DURHAM, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued November 16, 2020 - Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… bedroom. We see no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decisions on defendant's evidentiary objections. State v. …
-
njcourts.gov
… amended JOCs were entirely consistent with the judge's oral decisions and defendant's understanding of his sentence, and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1720-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RASHAUN A. FENTRESS, a/k/a SHAWN B. FENTRES, RASHUAN A. FENTRESS, RASHAUN BAN, ZEUS FENTRESS, RASHAUN ZUSE, and ALLAN FRANCIS, …
-
njcourts.gov
… (stating that "except in the most extreme cases, strategic decisions made by defense counsel will not present grounds … argument that the cumulative effect of several trial court decisions denied him a fair trial. Notably, defendant does … not cite any legal authority for his claim that the trial decisions were individually erroneous. 18 A-0179-16T3 There …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0046-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEQUAN ROGERS, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________________ Argued September 26, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez, Nugent, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0156-15T4 A-0157-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.M. and C.M., Defendants-Appellants. _______________________________ IN …
-
njcourts.gov
… cause for the initial motor vehicle stop." Citing our decisions in State v. Camillo, 382 N.J. Super. 113 (App. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1325-17T4 G.F.B., an Infant, by her Guardians Ad Litem, G.B. and H.E., and G.B. and H.E., Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SAINT JAMES SCHOOL, DIOCESE OF METUCHEN, FRANCIS COMISKEY, MARY …
-
njcourts.gov
… influence of any substance impacting his ability to make decisions. Additionally, defendant testified no one …
-
njcourts.gov
… the best position to engage in this balancing process. Its decisions are entitled to deference and are to be reviewed … guidelines for concurrent or consecutive-sentencing decisions: (1) there can be no free crimes in a system for …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-3873-16T3 A-3919-16T3 FLEMINGTON FIELDS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLEMINGTON FIELDS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant-Respondent. FLEMINGTON FIELDS …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5225-16T4 FRED KATZ and MARLA KATZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Respondents, v. CHARLES E. VOORHEES, Defendant-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant. _________________________________ Argued October 30, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2354-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.B., Defendant-Appellant, and M.D.N., Defendant. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5373-15T4 JOY SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. FIN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a New Jersey Limited Partnership, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, and UNITED …