njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0822-19 MAURO SQUICCIARINI, … The suit was dismissed because Squicciarini did not have clear title to the property. 2 We recognize … other than damages against the public entity or one of its employees." He also relies upon First Am. Title v. Rockaway, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3317-20 MARK NEWTON, … DC-008762-21. Mark Newton, appellant pro se. Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM 1 Plaintiff refers to the … to his property. Plaintiff immediately notified defendants' employees about the damage to his unit and property. In …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5053-15T2 MICHAEL KING, an infant by his … and "checking different things." Both Iodice and Bacino have been employed at Saint Barnabas for approximately two … level fluctuated under ninety, believing it could have been seconds or more. Iodice did not observe MK's …
-
njcourts.gov
… found Ms. Blake guilty, on March 25th • Respondent does not have a recollection of entering a finding of guilt on March … for "longstanding municipal court procedures" which have not been reduced to writing. The allegation is that … was provided to this judge by the Bergen County Municipal Division Manager for the ostensible purpose of so advising …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5053-15T2 MICHAEL KING, an infant by his … and "checking different things." Both Iodice and Bacino have been employed at Saint Barnabas for approximately two … level fluctuated under ninety, believing it could have been seconds or more. Iodice did not observe MK's …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0822-19 MAURO SQUICCIARINI, … The suit was dismissed because Squicciarini did not have clear title to the property. 2 We recognize … other than damages against the public entity or one of its employees." He also relies upon First Am. Title v. Rockaway, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5913-17T4 ALICIA RIVAS, … circumstances. She contends the court should not have granted summary judgment to West New York or Suez … result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.'" Townsend v. Pierre, 221 N.J. 36, 52 (2015) …
-
njcourts.gov
… agency will provide only sign language interpreters that have an SC:L or are RID certified and have a minimum of 60 hours of legal training. Should an … for the Deaf (RID) and listed with the New Jersey Division of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (See N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3317-20 MARK NEWTON, … DC-008762-21. Mark Newton, appellant pro se. Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM 1 Plaintiff refers to the … to his property. Plaintiff immediately notified defendants' employees about the damage to his unit and property. In …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0282-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … York. At some point defendant was transferred to Green Haven Correctional Facility (GHCF). Thereafter, defendant … and participating in drug treatment and attaining a high school diploma while incarcerated, the court sentenced …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0282-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … York. At some point defendant was transferred to Green Haven Correctional Facility (GHCF). Thereafter, defendant … and participating in drug treatment and attaining a high school diploma while incarcerated, the court sentenced …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2727-15T2 J.O., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset County, Docket No. L-1494-14. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2727-15T2 J.O., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset County, Docket No. L-1494-14. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2146-18T3 SUSAN CONSALES, Appellant, v. … delayed filing the appeal for circumstances which could not have been reasonably foreseen or prevented. 4 A-2146-18T3 … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors." [In re …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0301-16T1 DYSHON RAGLAND, Appellant, v. … received. Given the time line, Lieutenant Bundy would not have known about appellant's complaint when the Lieutenant … be sustained." Gerba v. Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System, 83 N.J. 174, 189 (1980) …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1128-16T3 LUIS A. TORRES, Appellant, v. … denying the grievance. The DOC explained, "Inmates do not have a right to obtain or to remain in a particular job … F.2d 627, 629 (3d Cir. 1989)). "[I]nmates entering prison have no concrete expectation of being given a job …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3867-15T1 THOMAS J. DEGRAZIA, Appellant, … or accommodations at work. In essence, he asserted it would have been futile, because he perceived there was no … no other suitable work available which the individual could have performed within the limits of the disability." …
-
2C:20-11b(5)
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… depriving the merchant of the full retail value thereof. I have already defined "purpose" for you earlier in these … $200, but does not exceed $500; or (4) is less than $200. I have already defined "full retail value" for you earlier in …
-
2C:33-1a
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… of disorderly conduct, AND (Choose applicable statutory provision) 2(a) That the defendant acted in common with the … weapon. "Known" here means simply to be aware of -- to have knowledge of the fact that a participant, who is a … to use it in the course of the disorderly conduct which I have previously defined. (At this point if applicable the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2146-18T3 SUSAN CONSALES, Appellant, v. … delayed filing the appeal for circumstances which could not have been reasonably foreseen or prevented. 4 A-2146-18T3 … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors." [In re …