njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1662-18T1 WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., AJS SUPERMARKETS, LLC, BUONDADONNA SHOPRITE, LLC, BROWN'S BC, LLC, OF NEW JERSEY, BROWN'S FH, LLC, LITTLE FALLS SHOPRITE SUPERMARKETS, INC., SHOPRITE OF HUNTERDON …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1527-18T3 STEVE RAMSHUR, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, MATTHEW J. COEFER, Records Custodian in the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0460-18T1 83 WILLOW AVENUE APARTMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 83 WILLOW, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and 89-91 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., REALTY EXPRESS LABARBERA PROPERTY …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2132-17T1 MEG YATAURO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GARY M. LANIGAN, Defendants-Appellants, and JUDY LANG and MARK FARSI, Defendants. _____________________________ Argued …
default
… for tampering with evidence is inconsistent with our decisions in State v. Sharpless, 314 N.J. Super. 440 (App. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1235-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.B., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 23, 2021 – Decided April 27, 2021 Before Judges …
default
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4837-18T2 JAMES P. MCGORY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SLS LANDSCAPING, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued …
default
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1074-16T3 JOY DESANCTIS;1 MICHAEL SEEBECK; PATRICIA COREA; NOREEN DEAN and JAMES BEAN, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BOROUGH OF …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0651-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRAVIS J. MIDDLEBROOKS, a/k/a BRANDON ADAMS, TRAVIS L. MIDDLEBROOKS, and BIG BABY, Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ …
njcourts.gov
… Cnty. Prosecutor, 171 N.J. 561, 571 (2002)). Evidentiary decisions are reviewed de novo, however, "whe[n] the trial …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2873-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. V.S., Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ IN THE MATTER OF A.D., a minor. …
njcourts.gov
… in family matters." Id. at 413. Further, discretionary decisions of the family court are afforded "great … v. Best Buy, 205 N.J. 213, 223 (2011). "When reviewing decisions granting or denying applications to modify child …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1799-23 TRACEY LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, v. LIZBETH TRUCKING, LLC, PABLO TRUCKING, LLC, and JOSE MENDOZA, Defendants-Respondents/ Cross-Appellants, and JAMES RIVER INSURANCE …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2159-22 SAMUEL BARRESI, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, v. FZG ENTERPRISES, LLC, d/b/a BIG LEAGUE DREAMS, a/k/a FGZ ENTERPRISES, LLC and FXG ENTERPRISES, LLC, GARY LIGUORI, ZANE KROMISH, …
-
njcourts.gov
… give you any idea of what the basis for his compensation decisions were? A: No. Q: Did you understand that you could …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1235-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.B., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 23, 2021 – Decided April 27, 2021 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4837-18T2 JAMES P. MCGORY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SLS LANDSCAPING, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued …
-
njcourts.gov
… For the reasons that follow, we affirm Judge Minkowitz's decisions substantially for the reasons expressed in his … in his comprehensive April 22, 2016 and July 25, 2016 decisions. We add only the following comments. The wording …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …