Filters
- A-2210-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… A-2210-15T3 MARLY CARO, on behalf of A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY or CORPORATION TO BE FORMED, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WILLIAM PEREZ, … This appeal followed.4 Defendant raises the following points on appeal: 4 Following the filing of the notice of …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted October 2, 2024 – Decided October 28, 2024 Before Judges Currier, Paganelli and Torregrossa- O'Connor. On … indictment against defendant, P.T., after finding he lacked competency. We affirm. I. A. The Indictments When arrested … feet of school property, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5(a), -7(a). B. The Competency Determinations Competency questions concerning …
- A-1053-22 – BRUCE HENDERSON VS. FRANK MARTINEZ, ET AL. (L-1893-19, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted October 2, 2024 – Decided October 16, 2024 Before Judges Mayer and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … (collectively, defendants), and dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. We affirm. We recite the facts … case back when I worked for Fox Rothschild, I've had no communications with him since then. And that was only within …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … enforcement officers may intercept and record a telephonic communication when a party to the conversation allows them … be given by the person who is a party to the telephonic communication and who is acting at the direction of a law …
- njcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … State failed to prove the officers who executed the search complied with the "knock-and-announce" rule. Specifically, defendant asserts that officers failed to comply with Attorney General Law Enforcement Directive No. …
- njcourts.gov… Argued November 15, 2023 – Decided December 22, 2023 Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia and Gummer. On appeal from the … Germinario appeals from summary judgment dismissing her complaint for age discrimination in violation of the Law … outside at dismissal to make "some kind of silly, stupid comment to the kids to try to make them laugh" and could …
- njcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … February 10, 2021, AC Ocean Walk filed a Chancery Division complaint against defendants, seeking: damages for breaches … liable for plaintiff's damages. Defendants answered the complaint and raised several counterclaims, which are not …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted June 4, 2024 – Decided June 19, 2024 Before Judges Paganelli and Whipple. On appeal from the … I. The motion judge summarized his factual findings in a comprehensive written opinion following the evidentiary … defendant about a cellphone and wallet he saw in the glove compartment and desserts in the back seat. Defendant advised …
- njcourts.gov… 2C:43-7.2. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT RECEIVED … do not . . . automatically require a new trial whenever 'a combing of the prosecutors ' files 6 A-1729-22 filed an … The theory of defendant's case did not have to be revisited as he contends. In fact, the State's DNA expert …
- njcourts.gov… Argued November 28, 2022 – Decided December 22, 2022 Before Judges Messano, Gilson, and Rose. On appeal from the … to real property owned by SM Logistics Holdco, LLC (the Company). The Company is a Delaware limited liability company that has two …
- njcourts.gov… Argued November 30, 2022 – Decided March 8, 2023 Before Judges Currier, Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the … that the small objects he saw looked like CDS, which often "come in small cylindrical objects or small envelopes and [are] usually loose. They come in certain colors." The officers then saw defendant …
- njcourts.gov… Argued June 7, 2023 – Decided October 4, 2023 Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia and Natali. On appeal from the … upon a showing that such use in a specified location will comply with the conditions and standards for the location or … finding "no useful purpose" would be served in light of the complete and thorough record before the Board and its …
- njcourts.gov… PURCHASING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, vs. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW … CAM-L-1025-22 CIVIL ACTION ORDER THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the application of Riker Danzig LLP, … member of the risk purchasing group. As Plaintiff correctly points out, neither party has cited authority suggesting …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted October 25, 2023 – Decided November 22, 2023 Before Judges Enright and Paganelli. On appeal from the … We glean the facts from the motion records. Defendant is a combat veteran of the United States Army. He also served in … defendant's appeal. In a thoughtful written opinion accompanying the May 29 order, Judge Lindemann stated …
- A-0389-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. K.H. (17-07-0529, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted February 6, 2024 – Decided March 25, 2024 Before Judges Whipple and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … for the reasons set forth in Judge Robert A. Kirsch's comprehensive written opinion. I. The circumstances of this … In exchange for his guilty pleas, the State agreed to recommend that defendant serve an aggregate thirteen-year …
- 1.14 Charges Document PDFnjcourts.gov… present when I explained the procedures about how the jury foreperson will announce the verdict by answering the … announcement of the verdict may be an emotional experience for you. I remind you that this is a courtroom, and I will …
- 5.32A Charges Document PDFnjcourts.gov… a pedestrian (or bicyclist) is under a duty to exercise for his/her own safety the care that a reasonably prudent …
- Non 2C Charges Document PDFnjcourts.gov… be fruitful. The trial judge may not impose a time limit for further jury deliberations. State v. Nelson, 304 N.J. … 566 (App. Div. 1997). 2 When a jury states that it cannot come to a unanimous verdict, it is appropriate for a trial … period of deliberations based upon the length and complexity of the trial. State v. Adim, 410 N.J. Super. 410, …
- Order - Attorney Resignations Without Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 1:20-22 (Order Dated 04-11-25) Notice to the Barnjcourts.govName City, State, Zipcode Attorney ID Laura D. Boyd Upper Nyack, NY 10960 013421990 Troy S. Brown Churchville, PA 18966 027061996 Brandon M. Dittman Aurora, CO 80013 239242018 Margot R. Finkel Brooklyn, NY 11201 180072016 Eva R. Gardner Anchorage, AK …
- njcourts.gov… Argued October 16, 2024 – Decided August 5, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Chase. On appeal from the … summary judgment dismissal of his age discrimination complaint against his former employers and supervisors, … Plaintiff's mean peer evaluation score, scored out of 100 points, was 85.583, C.M.C.'s was 86.083, and C.C.'s was 83. …