-
njcourts.gov
… by staff having observed defendant "nodding off" while visiting the office with the baby. The Board expressed … the children with defendant's mother "does not seem the best arrangement." Counsel argued, however, that the … was arrested for possession of marijuana on June 23, 2016, coinciding with a hair follicle test, which defendant …
-
njcourts.gov
… the children, limit Melissa's parenting time to supervised visitation in New Jersey, and require Melissa to submit to a … permanently allowing the children to move to Texas commencing with the 2024-25 school year, they were unable to … been shown . . . . Next, the judge addressed each of the best interests factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. After …
njcourts.gov
… a Division worker entered defendant's home for an announced visit, defendant told the worker that when A.K. was a baby, … as to the four statutory prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1—the "best interests of the child" test. The court entered a … 21 A-0748-20 substantial, credible evidence." Thieme v. Aucoin-Thieme, 227 N.J. 269, 283 (2016) (quoting Cesare v. …
-
njcourts.gov
… a Division worker entered defendant's home for an announced visit, defendant told the worker that when A.K. was a baby, … as to the four statutory prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1—the "best interests of the child" test. The court entered a … 21 A-0748-20 substantial, credible evidence." Thieme v. Aucoin-Thieme, 227 N.J. 269, 283 (2016) (quoting Cesare v. …
njcourts.gov
… to prove prongs two, three, and four of the statutory best- interests-of-the-child test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). … that defendant and Samantha regularly attended supervised visitation with Adam, although defendant missed several … Although defendant again began treatment, his initial compliance soon faltered. He failed to complete the …
-
njcourts.gov
… to prove prongs two, three, and four of the statutory best- interests-of-the-child test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). … that defendant and Samantha regularly attended supervised visitation with Adam, although defendant missed several … Although defendant again began treatment, his initial compliance soon faltered. He failed to complete the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Order to Show Cause for Temporary Custody … Docket Number: NOTICE: This is not … appearing / ☐ not appearing, ☐ notified / ☐ not notified ☐ complaint served / ☐ complaint not served, ☐ spoken language … the Application for Appointment of Counsel form; and 7. … Visitation … ☐ … a. Parent 1/ … Defendant … (s) … is/are …
-
njcourts.gov
… Number: … NOTICE: This is not a public document. The information entered on this form will be kept confidential. … appearing / ☐ not appearing, ☐ notified / ☐ not notified ☐ complaint served / ☐ complaint not served, ☐ spoken language … supervision and/or treatment of the child(ren); and 5. … Visitation … ☐ … a. Parent 1/Defendant(s) … is/are entitled …
-
njcourts.gov
… removed the children from New Jersey without first complying with N.J.S.A. 9:2-2. Plaintiff gave defendant less … court might grant defendant's pending motion for overnight visits with the children. After losing the trial, plaintiff … the order under review, and for the first time, requested a best interests analysis. We hold – because defendant had …
-
njcourts.gov
… WEITZ & LlJXF.NBF.RG A .Vel1' fork Prc~/i?ssional CorporC11io11 200 Lake Drive East. Suite 205 Cherry Hill. NJ 08002 (856) 755-1115 Attorneys for Plaintiff FILED FEB 26 2020 Judge James F. Hyland … MANUFACTURERS { 1-5). JACK DOE WHOLESALERS ( 1-5). JAKE DOE SELLERS (1-5). JOH;"\J DOE MARKETERS (1-5) and JOAN DOE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Suite :ws Cherry I lilt. NJ 08002 (856) 755-1115 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW ,JERSEY LAW DIVJSION - … (1-5). JACK DOE WHOLESALERS ( 1-5). .J/\.Kt. !JOI:, SELLERS ( 1-5 ), JOH> J DOE MARKETERS ( 1-5) and JOAN DOL … MANUFACTURERS (1-5), JACK DOE WHOLESALERS (1-5), JAKE DOE SELLERS (1-5), JOHN DOE MARKETERS (1-5) and JOAN DOE …
njcourts.gov
… and Permanency failed to prove the four prongs of the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) to (4) … was not in their best interests. The judge relied on the "compelling" testimony of the Division's adoption supervisor … her children to feel, for example, that her failure to visit would cause them pain. Although not optimistic about …
njcourts.gov
… for the reasons explained in the trial judge's comprehensive and detailed written opinion. Judge Gaus aptly … a multi-part test to determine when it is in the child's best interests to terminate parental rights. Specifically, … 11 A-3820-19 evaluations, bonding evaluations, supervised visitations, and individualized psychotherapy. We note …
njcourts.gov
… since that time. On September 9, 2009, the Division filed a complaint alleging defendants abused or neglected their … mental illness. She concluded that KLG gave Jessie "the best of both worlds" because it allowed Jessie to maintain … the child currently residing with her, and during Jessie's visits, did not establish that defendant's bipolar disorder …
-
njcourts.gov
… since that time. On September 9, 2009, the Division filed a complaint alleging defendants abused or neglected their … mental illness. She concluded that KLG gave Jessie "the best of both worlds" because it allowed Jessie to maintain … the child currently residing with her, and during Jessie's visits, did not establish that defendant's bipolar disorder …
-
njcourts.gov
… for the reasons explained in the trial judge's comprehensive and detailed written opinion. Judge Gaus aptly … a multi-part test to determine when it is in the child's best interests to terminate parental rights. Specifically, … 11 A-3820-19 evaluations, bonding evaluations, supervised visitations, and individualized psychotherapy. We note …
-
njcourts.gov
… and Permanency failed to prove the four prongs of the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(1) to (4) … was not in their best interests. The judge relied on the "compelling" testimony of the Division's adoption supervisor … her children to feel, for example, that her failure to visit would cause them pain. Although not optimistic about …
njcourts.gov
… just two out of fourteen days. As a result, plaintiff has become the de facto primary residential custodian. Defendant … both parties to submit their custody and parenting time/visitation plan pursuant to Rule 5:8-5 because plaintiff … affect the welfare of the child such that his or her best interests would best be served by modifying the current …
-
njcourts.gov
… just two out of fourteen days. As a result, plaintiff has become the de facto primary residential custodian. Defendant … both parties to submit their custody and parenting time/visitation plan pursuant to Rule 5:8-5 because plaintiff … affect the welfare of the child such that his or her best interests would best be served by modifying the current …
njcourts.gov
… order dismissing the Division's second guardianship complaint filed in 2015, N.J. Div. of Child Protection & … under a non-dissolution docket. Because the children's best interest requires the permanency a guardianship order … the Division in contempt for failing to arrange therapeutic visitation as previously ordered, and twice rejected the …