-
njcourts.gov
… actions [could] be reasonably viewed as pre-trial tactical decisions." 6 Defendant filed a pro se motion seeking to …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0236-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. W.B., Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3869-18T1 BAY HARBOR PLAZA, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHAILI MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and BHUPEN PATEL, Defendants-Appellants. __________________________ Submitted July 14, 2020 – Decided July …
-
njcourts.gov
… 412 (quoting Dolson, 55 N.J. at 6). We review appeals from decisions on motions for a new trial by the same standard …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4900-16T1 A-4901-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.S.C. and W.L.-R., Defendants-Appellants. …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. S.B., 230 N.J. 62, 67 (2017). Thus, “[w]e review such decisions de novo, ‘unconstrained by deference to the decisions of the trial court or the appellate panel.’” Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
-
njcourts.gov
… the property transferred. [Id.] There are a scarcity of decisions explicitly dealing with section 1.1. Of the reported decisions, the Supreme Court has mentioned section 1.1 twice … section 1.1 in reaching the decision. However, none of the decisions have squarely dealt with the applicability of …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS ROCKLAND ELECTRIC COMPANY, : TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY : DOCKET NO.: 008111-2016 Plaintiff, : : v. : : DIRECTOR, DIVISION, : OF TAXATION, : : Defendant. : : Decided: April 30, …
-
njcourts.gov
… trial testimony. He also contends the judge erred in her decisions regarding custody, parenting time, equitable …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3031-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. O.A.C., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted October 13, 2021 – Decided September 28, 2022 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
… 369, 384-85 (2010)). "Appellate review of the trial court's decisions proceeds in the same sequence, with the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Thurber heard oral argument on the motions and placed her decisions on the record. The judge determined that Tepper's …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1204-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. YUSUF IBRAHIM, a/k/a YUSUT IBRAHIM, YUSEF F. IBRAHIM, YUSIF IBRAHIM, YUSLIF IBRAHIM, YUSUF IBRAHAM, and YUSUF MESHAL, Defendant-Appellant. …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5632-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.L.,1 Defendant-Respondent. ______________________________ Submitted January 29, 2020 – Decided March 17, 2020 Before …
-
njcourts.gov
… may have been strategic reasons to justify trial counsel's decisions in the case, an evidentiary hearing, including the …
-
njcourts.gov
… to conclusions of law made by trial courts in suppression decisions, "which we instead review de novo." Boone, 232 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3657-17T2 BERLIN CROSS KEYS SHOPPING CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN SAMOST, ESQUIRE, and LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN SAMOST, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, and SAMINVEST CO., LLC, …
-
njcourts.gov
… possession of heroin. "[Our] review of sentencing decisions is relatively narrow and is governed by an abuse …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4392-17T1 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GERALDINE FRANKLIN, Deceased. _________________________ Argued telephonically December 18, 2019 – Decided January 30, 2020 Before Judges Yannotti and …