-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3168-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JERMAINE KING, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted December 7, 2022 – Decided February 2, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and …
-
njcourts.gov
… by the parties and the community as a whole on prior decisions,' (2) whether the purpose of the new rule will be …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3655-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KHALIF O. JAMES, a/k/a OMAR KHALIF, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted September 12, 2023 – Decided October 13, 2023 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3418-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RAMON PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted November 29, 2023 – Decided March 5, 2024 Before Judges Vernoia and …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0434-23 KRITHIGA SADEESHKUMAR, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SADEESHKUMAR VENUGOPAL, Defendant-Appellant. …
-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State …
-
njcourts.gov
… Cnty. Prosecutor, 171 N.J. 561, 571 (2002)). Evidentiary decisions are reviewed de novo, however, “whe[n] the trial …
-
njcourts.gov
… reviewed de novo, "unconstrained by deference to the decisions of the trial court . . . [,]" State v. Grate, 220 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2030-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GUY C. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Argued March 5, 2025 – Decided July 14, 2025 Before Judges Gummer and …
-
njcourts.gov
… accordance with a deferential standard. '[A] trial court's decisions regarding voir dire are not to be disturbed on … Winder, 200 N.J. at 252) (explaining that a trial court's decisions during voir dire should not be disturbed "except …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0249-24 J.W.,1 Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. _________________________ Argued November 18, 2025 – Decided January 12, …
-
njcourts.gov
… to move freely and act independently and make autonomous decisions. [415 N.J. Super. 551, 564 (App. Div. 2010).] The …
njcourts.gov
E.L., 1 v. J.V., Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Argued March 12, 2026 -Decided April 6, 2026 Before Judges Marczyk and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Passaic County, Docket No. …
njcourts.gov
TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY JOSHUA D. NOVIN Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Justice Building Judge 495 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd., 4th Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 Tel: (609) 815-2922, Ext. 54680 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT …
njcourts.gov
… not entitled to any special deference, and we review those decisions de novo. State v. Ugrovics, 410 N.J. Super. 482, …
njcourts.gov
… Corp. v. Rideout, 16 N.J. 252, 261 (1954) ("Our judicial decisions have faithfully sought to vindicate both policies …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2661-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NATHANIEL YOUNG, JR., a/k/a NATHANIEL YOUNG, and NATE E. YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted November 7, 2022 – …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
njcourts.gov
… 178 N.J. at 155). In Paragon, we confronted competing decisions in the Appellate Division and trial courts over …