default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3329-19 LUIS A. TORRES, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted October 25, 2021 – Decided November 8, 2021 Before Judges Sabatino …
njcourts.gov
… binding on us and decided years before NERA was enacted. Decisions such as the one made by the Law Division judge in …
-
njcourts.gov
New Jersey Judiciary Voluntary Surrender of Parental Rights Form Defendant’s name: County: Docket Number: Judge: Name(s) of Child(ren) to be surrendered DOB Name of other parent ☐ General Surrender ☐ Identified Surrender to: (I194) (I195) Answer …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5548-15T4 WALI PALMER, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. _________________________________ Submitted January 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Leone and Mawla. On …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1128-16T3 LUIS A. TORRES, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted February 6, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Gilson. On …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3329-19 LUIS A. TORRES, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted October 25, 2021 – Decided November 8, 2021 Before Judges Sabatino …
-
njcourts.gov
… binding on us and decided years before NERA was enacted. Decisions such as the one made by the Law Division judge in …
njcourts.gov
… generally will not disturb the Department's administrative decisions unless the inmate demonstrates that the decision …
-
njcourts.gov
… generally will not disturb the Department's administrative decisions unless the inmate demonstrates that the decision …
-
A-0856-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… an officer in those circumstances and not leave such decisions entirely to colleagues with whom the officer … on the county prosecutor numerous, important discretionary decisions related to the removal and return of service … determinations did not credit the nuanced, discretionary decisions that prosecutors are called on to make in the …
-
A-0158-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Interpretations are Consistent with the Federal Courts’ Decisions. (Not Addressed Below) … judicial comity requires giving “due respect” for the decisions of the lower federal courts—particularly when the … least, Dewey requires consideration of the reasoning of the decisions from the lower federal courts. And, if a New …
-
A-0158-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Interpretations are Consistent with the Federal Courts’ Decisions. (Not Addressed Below) … judicial comity requires giving “due respect” for the decisions of the lower federal courts—particularly when the … least, Dewey requires consideration of the reasoning of the decisions from the lower federal courts. And, if a New …
-
njcourts.gov
… they committed murder. Id. at 465, 467. Referencing its decisions in Roper and Graham, the Court in Miller … 376-77. Generally citing the United States Supreme Court's decisions in Miller, Graham, and Roper, the Comer Court … The Influence of Neuroscience on U.S. Supreme Court Decisions about Adolescents' Criminal Culpability, 14 Nature …
-
A-2660-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
BRIEF OF APPELLANT EAST RUTHERFORD TWO, LLC CULLEN AND DYKMAN, LLP 229 Nassau Street Princeton, NJ 08542 (609) 279-0900 Neil Yoskin, Esq. nyoskin@cullenllp.com Attorneys for Appellant East Rutherford Two, LLC Neil Yoskin, Esq. (002091982) Of Counsel and …
njcourts.gov
… or absolute." Id. at 455. Consistent with "all agency decisions, those rendered by the Parole Board are subject to …
-
njcourts.gov
… or absolute." Id. at 455. Consistent with "all agency decisions, those rendered by the Parole Board are subject to …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0202-19T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KURT T. HARRIS, Defendant-Respondent. _______________________________ Submitted February 24, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0202-19T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KURT T. HARRIS, Defendant-Respondent. _______________________________ Submitted February 24, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and …
default
… AND DUE PROCESS (ALONG WITH NEW JERSEY STATE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS INCLUDING RUVOLDT V. NOLAN, 63 N.J. 171 (1973) ALONG WITH DECISIONS OF THIS COURT INCLUDING [Knox v. Public Employees' …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3452-17T2 LARRY PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OZ HOLDINGS, LLC and UNION CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendants-Respondents. ______________________________ Argued January 23, 2019– Decided …