-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 23, 2024 – Decided April 30, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Haas. On appeal from the … which ended in May 2022. On February 15, 2023, K.B. filed a complaint seeking the entry of a Temporary Restraining Order … home. Eight days later, on February 23, 2023, M.L. filed a complaint seeking a TRO against K.B. for allegedly making …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 17, 2023 – Decided June 21, 2023 Before Judges Vernoia and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … an evidentiary hearing. Because we are satisfied the court complied with our remand instructions and correctly denied … Except for a single charge of first-degree conspiracy to commit armed robbery, on which the jury hung, defendant was …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 1, 2023 – Decided June 12, 2023 Before Judges Mayer and Fisher. On appeal from the Superior … as either an active participant in the abuse or as an accomplice in the crimes of others. After appropriate mergers, … assault, on the one hand, and her involvement as an accomplice, on the other. For a better understanding of these …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 1, 2023 – Decided June 2, 2023 Before Judges Mayer and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … to Rule 1:4-8. We affirm. I. The underlying facts are not complex. In November 2009, plaintiff, a contractor and … air handlers; however, the installation was never completed. When plaintiff failed to install the air …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 7, 2023 – Decided April 20, 2023 Before Judges Geiger, Susswein, and Berdote Byrne. On appeal from the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, Government Records Council, GRC Complaint Nos. 2018-291 and 2018-306. Voris M. Tejada argued …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … a motor vehicle that police believed he used during the commission of a fatal shooting. The State maintains police … Court's decision in Gonzales: We conclude with two final points. Plain view, in most instances, will not be the sole …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 20, 2022 – Decided January 27, 2023 Before Judges Rose and Paganelli. 1 Improperly pled as Azu … (2) November 20, 2020, denying plaintiff's motion to compel discovery; and (3) December 29, 2020, denying … objection. Meanwhile, in March 2020, Rotimi filed the complaint in the present matter, alleging violations of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… (609) 348-4515 Fax: (609) 348-6834 emuskett@foxrothschild.com Attorneys for Defendants Merck & Co., Inc., and Merck Sharp & Dome … ORDER DISMISSING CASES WITH PREJUDICE THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon Defendants, Merck & Co., Inc., …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 12, 2022 – Decided September 21, 2022 Before Judges Mawla and Marczyk. On appeal from the Board of … filed for her PERS service retirement, which would become effective on February 1, 2015. Petitioner claims she … to exercise its equitable authority in light of the competent evidence and that petitioner demonstrated good …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 8, 2023 – Decided March 6, 2023 Before Judges Firko and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … the case may be. 4 A-1446-21 After defendant purchased the company, he alleged plaintiffs misrepresented its value and … he had "the right to a speedy trial" and Brekke's "lag [in commencing the proceedings] is far overreaching to …
-
njcourts.gov
… Civil Action * DECISION AND ORDER REGARDING PRIVILEGE LOG Before this court is an application submitted by Adam Slater, … In New Jersey, the attorney-client privilege applies to communications if they are "expressed by an individual … Standards The mere fact that an attorney is involved in a communication does not automatically make that communication …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 11, 2023 – Decided September 19, 2023 Before Judges Sabatino and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … to proceed in the future." She expressed concern that a complaint would be sent to defendant through the mail … discovery to provide, including any statements and/or communication with the alleged victim? [Assistant Prosecutor …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … state court has personal jurisdiction over a defendant Utah company and its owner who entered into a contract to reserve … postponed because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the company and its owner declined to refund plaintiff's payment …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 6, 2023 – Decided January 8, 2024 Before Judges Firko and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … life insurance and health insurance for [R.B.] shall be revisited and resolved. [(Emphasis added.)] Paragraph 6.1 of … adjudication that R.B. is not 7 A-0484-22 emancipated; to compel defendant to pay child support directly to plaintiff …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 29, 2023 – Decided February 12, 2024 Before Judges Firko and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … to a second-degree aggravated sexual assault with a recommendation for a nine-year prison term and the ability to … Ten years is the offer. That's what the State is recommending. Maybe, based on what [defense counsel] presents …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 29, 2023 – Decided December 13, 2023 Before Judges Firko and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … County, Docket No. FV-08-1017-22. Tonacchio, Spina & Compitello, attorneys for appellant (Stephen R. Cappetta, on … those facts were correctly applied to the law. Defendant points to no evidence in the record that undermines the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 8, 2023 - Decided November 22, 2023 Before Judges Whipple, Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the … Staffing, LLC, and Rick Frankovits, and dismissing his complaint with prejudice. We affirm. We recite the facts … director of API's Paramus location, which had been the company's "flagship" location. In his capacity as a managing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 14, 2024 – Decided March 14, 2024 Before Judges Vernoia and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … Division order, entered after a bench trial, dismissing the complaint, in which plaintiff had asserted causes of action … I. The pertinent facts are not disputed. Plaintiff owns commercial property located at 115 Main Road in Montville, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 23, 2023 – Decided March 27, 2024 Before Judges Gilson, DeAlmeida and Berdote Byrne. On appeal … not administered according to standardized instructions, compromising the results. Defendant subsequently entered a … recording to his expert. Judge Robert J. Jones issued a comprehensive written opinion rejecting defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 16, 2024 – Decided May 8, 2024 Before Judges Whipple and Augostini. On appeal from the … Plaintiff voluntarily withdrew this domestic violence complaint and dismissed the TRO. The parties entered a … Hoffman was decided. Therefore, defendant urges us to revisit this issue. We decline to do so and add only the …