default
… Submitted February 14, 2022 – Decided April 28, 2022 Before Judges Rothstadt and Natali. On appeal from the … the QDRO and to pay Pension Appraisers the full $495 to commence the QDRO's preparation within seven days. On July … enforcement of defendant's obligation to cooperate in the processing of the QDRO and requiring her to provide an …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted July 13, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Suter and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … his trial counsel did not file appropriate motions or complete the investigation prior to the plea-cutoff date, … to raise that his trial counsel was ineffective in the plea process, that PCR counsel advised against raising the claim, …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 2, 2019 – Decided March 6, 2020 Before Judges Moynihan and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the New … Borough) appeals from a final agency decision issued by the Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Transportation … to a clear and unambiguous result . . . [the] interpretive process is over," Richardson v. Bd. of Trs., PRFS, 192 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 14, 2022 – Decided April 28, 2022 Before Judges Rothstadt and Natali. On appeal from the … the QDRO and to pay Pension Appraisers the full $495 to commence the QDRO's preparation within seven days. On July … enforcement of defendant's obligation to cooperate in the processing of the QDRO and requiring her to provide an …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted July 13, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Suter and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … his trial counsel did not file appropriate motions or complete the investigation prior to the plea-cutoff date, … to raise that his trial counsel was ineffective in the plea process, that PCR counsel advised against raising the claim, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 2, 2019 – Decided March 6, 2020 Before Judges Moynihan and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the New … Borough) appeals from a final agency decision issued by the Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Transportation … to a clear and unambiguous result . . . [the] interpretive process is over," Richardson v. Bd. of Trs., PRFS, 192 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 11, 2024 – Decided October 8, 2024 Before Judges Currier, Marczyk and Torregrossa- O'Connor. On … Union of New Jersey, American Civil Liberties Union, and Community Health Law Project (American Civil Liberties Union … amicus curiae. They contend the court violated P.D.B.'s due process rights because he did not have notice or an …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 17, 2024 – Decided December 30, 2024 Before Judges Perez Friscia and Bergman. On appeal from the … on the property did not occur, plaintiff filed a verified complaint and an order to show cause on June 3 to compel the … her motion to intervene, "violat[ing] her rights to due process under both the [f]ederal and [s]tate …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 24, 2022 – Decided March 10, 2023 Before Judges Currier, DeAlmeida and Smith. On appeal from the … 29, 2021 order of the Law Division dismissing its verified complaint in lieu of prerogative writs challenging the award … contract. Because the bid specifications did not contain a process for designation of a subcontractor, RTS's bid did …
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 28, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … J. Walls and Darryl C. Walls, and dismissing plaintiff's complaint on summary judgment. Having carefully reviewed the … the sidewalk's dangerous and hazardous condition. The process server's affidavit of service indicated that he …
default
… Argued January 22, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Whipple and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court … in the Business Zone. In July 2015, plaintiff filed a complaint in lieu of prerogative writs under Docket No. … in the notice of appeal that are subject to the appeal process and review." W.H. Indus., Inc. v. Fundicao …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 26, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … notice of intent to foreclose, the Bank filed a foreclosure complaint on June 14, 2017. Defendant filed a contesting … SCHEME VOIDS THE CONTRACTS. (Not raised below). POINT X DUE PROCESS VIOLATION. THE COURT MISSTATED, MISAPPLIED LAW, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 28, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … J. Walls and Darryl C. Walls, and dismissing plaintiff's complaint on summary judgment. Having carefully reviewed the … the sidewalk's dangerous and hazardous condition. The process server's affidavit of service indicated that he …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 22, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Whipple and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court … in the Business Zone. In July 2015, plaintiff filed a complaint in lieu of prerogative writs under Docket No. … in the notice of appeal that are subject to the appeal process and review." W.H. Indus., Inc. v. Fundicao …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 26, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … notice of intent to foreclose, the Bank filed a foreclosure complaint on June 14, 2017. Defendant filed a contesting … SCHEME VOIDS THE CONTRACTS. (Not raised below). POINT X DUE PROCESS VIOLATION. THE COURT MISSTATED, MISAPPLIED LAW, …
default
… Submitted September 14, 2021 – Decided September 23, 2021 Before Judges Fisher and Smith. On appeal from the New Jersey … of Corrections (DOC) final decision finding that Scirica committed prohibited act *.2521, encouraging others to riot, … arbitrary and capricious and that the DOC violated his due process rights. We affirm for the reasons set forth below. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 14, 2021 – Decided September 23, 2021 Before Judges Fisher and Smith. On appeal from the New Jersey … of Corrections (DOC) final decision finding that Scirica committed prohibited act *.2521, encouraging others to riot, … arbitrary and capricious and that the DOC violated his due process rights. We affirm for the reasons set forth below. …
default
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … of Deeds and Mortgages (Essex Register) and dismissing the complaint of plaintiff, the New Jersey Land Title … fees in N.J.S.A. 22A:4-4.1 do not address the electronic processing of documents. We disagree. 9 A-5028-16T1 In 2012, …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … of Deeds and Mortgages (Essex Register) and dismissing the complaint of plaintiff, the New Jersey Land Title … fees in N.J.S.A. 22A:4-4.1 do not address the electronic processing of documents. We disagree. 9 A-5028-16T1 In 2012, …
njcourts.gov
… 2015 – Remanded Resubmitted September 21, 2017 - Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Manahan. On appeal from the Superior … the record, we affirm for the reasons stated in the comprehensive written opinion of Judge John H. Pursel. We … imprisonment. Further, Clarke was advised during the plea process of the consequences of his plea, which he …