-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 18, 2025 – Decided January 8, 2026 Before Judges Gilson and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … (Courtney Cittadini, Chief Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief). PER CURIAM Defendant Gregory Byrd appeals …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 18, 2025 – Decided December 5, 2025 Before Judges Rose and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … to the shooting. Finding aggravating factors three (risk of committing another offense) and nine (general and specific …
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON … MONMOUTH COUNTY DOCKET NO. F-4497-23 JOSEPH LAZARUS and RENAH LAZARUS, Plaintiffs, v. HABIB TAWIL and LILLY …
njcourts.gov
… March 10, 2026 – Decided March 18, 2026 Before Judges Firko and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … testimony from an employee, R.B., from Batesville Casket Company and his neighbor, F.M. Defendant owns funeral homes … docket," where there are "no hybrids" and "no halfway points" warrants reversal of the FRO. Defendant maintains he …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 2, 2025 – Decided February 26, 2026 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Torregrossa- O'Connor. On appeal from the Superior Court … are emancipated." The parties agreed to "exchange income information" upon the termination of plaintiff's …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 17, 2025 – Decided April 3, 2025 Before Judges Gummer, Berdote Byrne, and Jacobs. 1 We use the parties' initials and fictitious … trial court erred in holding that Jerry had proved Sarah committed the predicate act of harassment and misapplied the …
njcourts.gov
… Administrator ad Prosequendum for Estate of RANIEL HERNANDEZ, SILVANA LANSIGAN DELVALLE and RALPH HERNANDEZ, … whose danger is known or obvious to them." La Russa v. Four Points at Sheraton Hotel, 16 A-2248-21 360 N.J. Super. 156, … or even warning, against dangers which are known to the visitor, or so obvious to him that he may be expected to …
njcourts.gov
… JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2174-20 CESAR SABINO and LOURDES JAIME, Plaintiffs, and JULIO MOREJON, … by passing a resolution authorizing the filing of an ethics complaint against him; and (3) all defendants violated … to establish a contractual basis for damages. III. In Points Two through Five, plaintiff argues that the trial …
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CITY OF … Board of Education’s (“Plaintiff’s”) Verified Complaint and Order to Show Cause to restrain the Essex County Board … Interpretive Statement read: “Presently the Mayor appoints members to serve on the City’s Board of Education. If …
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CITY OF … Edelstein & Celso, LLC, attorneys). Eric S. Pennington and Gracia R. Montilus for defendant, City of Orange … interpretive statement read: “Presently the Mayor appoints members to serve on the City’s Board of Education. If …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 2, 2022 – Decided January 4, 2023 Before Judges Vernoia and Natali. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … which he described to others as "a cannon," to an apartment complex. 3 A-0140-21 Defendant fired the gun and confronted …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 12, 2023 – Decided January 17, 2024 Before Judges Whipple, Mayer, and Enright. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … J.P.1 appeals from a March 18, 2022 order dismissing his complaint with prejudice and denying his cross-motion for …
njcourts.gov
… v. TAMODD YOUNG, a/k/a JASHON A. HOOVER and TIJOHN CATO, Defendant-Appellant. … interests of the witness outweigh the Judiciary's general commitment to transparency, initials are used to protect the … This appeal followed. II. Defendant raises the following points for our consideration: I. IT WAS REVERSIBLE ERROR TO …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3603-20 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMITMENT OF D.G. _______________________ Submitted May 9, 2022 – Decided March 30, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … even though it is guided by medical expert testimony,'" points the State makes here. R.F., 217 N.J. at 174 (quoting …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0429-21 PEGGY BIRMINGHAM and DUANE CARPINELLI, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. TRAVELERS … the cause for appellant St. Paul Protective Insurance Company (Law Offices of Tina Newsome-Lee, attorneys; …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 13, 2023 – Decided November 28, 2023 Before Judges Mawla and Vinci. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … the alimony "payment is based upon [plaintiff's] annual income of $114,000[] and [defendant's] annual income of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3866-14T3 MFC RESOURCES, INC.; MFC COMMODITIES GMBH; MFC COMMODITIES U.S.A., L.P., INC.; MFC COMMODITIES U.S.A., G.P., INC.; and POSSEHL MEXICO, S.A. D.E. C.V., Plaintiffs-Appellants, … final unless and until they resolved several important open points, drafted a formal settlement document, and received …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 7, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Rothstadt. On appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey, … contiguous lots. On appeal, plaintiff raises the following points for this court's consideration: POINT I THE TAX … Zoning Board of Adjustment categorized plaintiff as "a community service organization not operated for profit" and …
njcourts.gov
… telephonically June 2, 2020 – Decided July 16, 2020 Before Judges Yannotti, Hoffman and Currier. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … Along with her answer, Demetro filed a third-party complaint against Slater Tenaglia, alleging the law firm …
njcourts.gov
… December 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino, Sumners and Natali. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … takeaways" from the data were and to identify which "data points illustrate that[.]" He followed up with another email … . . . . Procedurally, where a judge is inclined to revisit a prior interlocutory order, what is critical is that …