-
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2376-23 JESSE DE CHACON and LAURA GREER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CAESARS … appeal, we affirm. I. On March 7, 2019, plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Law Division, seeking damages from Caesars … Plaintiffs have acknowledged Nieves pleaded guilty "freely and voluntarily." N.J.S.A. 2C:12- 1(b)(7) provides …
-
njcourts.gov
… OROURKE, ANTONIO H. PABON, ANTONIO J. PABON, ANTONIO PAVON, and ANTONIO PABON MATOS, Defendant-Appellant. … Monmouth County indictment with conspiracy to commit murder and related offenses for his part in a … November 3, 2023. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I AS THE WARRANTLESS …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER: The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint. These figures have not been verified for accuracy … Date: Judgment Type: 1/15/2025 Complaint & Counterclaim W/D Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Interest: Credit …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER: The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint. These figures have not been verified for accuracy … Judgment Date: Judgment Type: 8/23/2022 Complaint Withdrawn Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Interest: Credit …
-
njcourts.gov
… DISCLAIMER - The Original Assessment and County Board Judgment figures used in this report have been provided by the party filing the complaint and have not been verified for accuracy by the Tax … Co Bd Assessment: Tax Ct Judgment: Judgment type: Freeze Act: Applied: Year 1: Year 2: Added/Omitted: Pro …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 23, 2026 – Decided March 18, 2026 Before Judges Walcott-Henderson and Bergman. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … unemployment and financial hardship." In the accompanying statement of reasons, the court found …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 18, 2024 – Decided April 9, 2025 Before Judges Gummer and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … to dismiss the remaining counts in the indictment and recommend a prison term not to exceed eight years, with 85% …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 20, 2026 – Decided January 29, 2026 Before Judges Natali and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from the Superior Court of … with the vicinage's Criminal Division manager who recommended against defendant's admission into PTI. 1 Miranda …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 13, 2025 – Decided December 8, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … unlawful purpose. Defendant was eighteen years old when he committed these offenses. The matter was tried before a jury …
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, v. OTWAY K. GARLAND, Defendant-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant. … Argued November 12, 2025 – Decided December 10, 2025 Before Judges Gilson and Vinci. On appeal from an … was charged in a single indictment with crimes allegedly committed in connection with the following events: an …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … December 14, 2010 - Decided By Judges Parrillo, Espinosa and Skillman. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … 1/2). This shall include officers responding to their own complaints, as witnesses at the direction of their superior …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … March 22, 2011 – Decided Before Judges Parrillo, Yannotti and Roe. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … Saums was entitled to any of the monies she sought in her complaint, and filed a counterclaim seeking $33,400 for …
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY … attorneys) for Defendants Robin Brown, Odabash Family LLC, and 27 Kinderkamack Road Associates III, LLC only Allen … may be subject to a protective order. The matter will be revisited on July 19th, 2019. CONCLUSION For the foregoing …
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY … David Stein, (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., attorneys) for Plaintiff Arla Cahill, (Mandelbaum Salsburg, P.C., attorneys) for Defendants …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 3, 2022 – Decided November 3, 2022 Before Judges Currier, Enright, and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from an interlocutory order … the court's December 27, 2021 order denying his motion to compel the forensic psychiatric examination of a …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5156-10T2 SPARTAN OIL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY … INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Respondent, and PLANET INSURANCE COMPANY and RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … JUDY MORRIS, ELIZABETH THOMAS-EDWARDS, FOX RUN CORPORATION and MACK-MORRIS BTE, INC., Defendants-Respondents. … After the loan and mortgage went into default, Midlantic commenced an action to foreclose on the property. The …
njcourts.gov
… February 14, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Fasciale. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, … windows and the door locks. . . it was actually inside a compartment in there." Ballistic testing indicated the … judge simply advised defendant he may not want to speak as freely in order to protect his claim of innocence for the …
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Joseph M. Andresini, P.J.T.C. 125 State Street, Suite 100 Presiding … enforced by the municipality. The subject property has two points of ingress and one point of egress. For the 2016 tax …
njcourts.gov
… v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND,1 Respondent-Respondent. Argued January 10, … his monthly pension survivor beneficiary. Emerson then completed a Designation of Beneficiary form electing Edlyn … filed this appeal. Petitioner raises the following points on appeal: POINT ONE: THE BOARD'S DECISION SHOULD BE …