-
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2154-23 KAYRONNA C. BENJAMIN- CARTER, as Ad Pros Administrator of the Estate of S.E.C., KAYRONNA C. BENJAMIN- CARTER, individually, and GREGORY L. CARTER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHN …
-
A-8-24 Brief In Support Of Motion
Briefs
njcourts.gov
ROSALYN MUSK.ER, SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, DOCKET NO.: v. CIVIL ACTION SUUCHI, INC., SUUCHI ON MOTION FOR LEA VE TO APPEAL: RAMESH, MARK HERMAN and APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0841-23 BEN ZUCKER, individually, and …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0043-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FREDDY BRAMBILA, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________ Submitted November 7, 2024 – Decided January 8, 2025 Before …
-
njcourts.gov
… In this respect, Cole displaced our own previous appellate decisions that had required a party asserting an opponent's …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3083-23 JULIEN J. COPPI and ALEXIS J. COPPI, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAMILY ADVENTURES NORTH JERSEY, LLC d/b/a URBAN AIR TRAMPOLINE AND ADVENTURE PARK, and UATP MANAGEMENT, LLC, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1763-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMIE CATELLI, Defendant-Appellant. Argued February 5, 2024 – Decided April 24, 2024 Before Judges Mawla and Marczyk. On appeal from the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1850-20 31-01 BROADWAY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company, and CAMEO FABRIC CARE, INC., an entity, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1850-20 31-01 BROADWAY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company, and CAMEO FABRIC CARE, INC., an entity, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0921-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHAWN REEVES, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued December 20, 2022 – Decided March 6, 2023 Before Judges Susswein, Berdote …
-
njcourts.gov
… school supplies, as required by the PSA. "When reviewing decisions granting or denying applications to modify child …
-
njcourts.gov
… for a new trial. "The standard of review on appeal from decisions on motions for a new trial is the same as that …
-
njcourts.gov
… the reasons explained in Judge Lindemann's cogent written decisions. 4 A-2079-22 I. The facts are undisputed. SIR is … provision mirrors the advice the Court pronounced in those decisions, by stating: "this insurance does not cover any …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3397-21 ALEXANDER CARDILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON BOARD OF EDUCATION, EILEEN SHAFER, M.ED, in her official capacity and …
-
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
… "rip[s] away any confidence in the finality of court decisions." Again, we disagree. 23 A-0684-21 The doctrine of …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4004-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. E.T. and R.H., Defendants, and R.E.T., Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2477-24 SHERRI A. AFFRUNTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REED SMITH LLP, Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Argued …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2199-23 REIMAGINED MIND COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JERSEY CIY SCHOOL DISTRICT and INTEGRATED CARE CONCEPTS & CONSULTATION, LLC, Defendants-Respondents, and ROBERT …
-
njcourts.gov
## NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in …