njcourts.gov
… Prison, 268 N.J. Super. 301, 304 (App. Div. 1993). Board decisions are "accorded a strong presumption of …
njcourts.gov
… and was 'inexcusable' and 'intolerable.'" Citing seminal decisions issued by our Supreme Court, the Commission … Super. 429, 437 (App. Div. 2001). Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions … 578 (1982)). Because appellate courts defer to the agency's decisions, reviewing courts should consider "whether such …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4478-18T2 RONALD RICE, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted December 8, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal …
-
njcourts.gov
… not set forth "a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
… severe. Appellate review of administrative agency decisions is limited. A reviewing court generally will not … and appellant does not identify, anything in the respective decisions to suggest the invocation of an adverse inference …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0497-16T1 POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 277, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS AND SHERIFF, Defendants-Respondents. Argued December 20, 2017 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0377-24 STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M.C., a juvenile. _______________________ Submitted March 18, 2025 – Decided April 15, 2025 Before Judges Firko and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal …
-
njcourts.gov
… and was 'inexcusable' and 'intolerable.'" Citing seminal decisions issued by our Supreme Court, the Commission … Super. 429, 437 (App. Div. 2001). Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions … 578 (1982)). Because appellate courts defer to the agency's decisions, reviewing courts should consider "whether such …
-
njcourts.gov
… Prison, 268 N.J. Super. 301, 304 (App. Div. 1993). Board decisions are "accorded a strong presumption of …
default
… petitioners E.D. and I.W. challenge separate final agency decisions of the Department of Human Services (DHS), … services. On appeal, petitioners primarily claim DMAHS's decisions were arbitrary and capricious because reduction in … N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1 to -15. We disagree and affirm both decisions. I. We glean the pertinent facts and procedural …
njcourts.gov
… was somehow not in a proper capacity to be able to make the decisions he made and it's belied by the agreement. It's … 11, 2019, February 28, 2020, and April 17, 2020 oral decisions that he was familiar with the issues raised in … not set forth "a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
njcourts.gov
… POINT IV. THE PROVOST IS NOT EMPOWERED TO MAKE HIS DECISIONS BY FIAT. POINT V. SETON HALL'S ARBITRARY DECISION … is not a basis to revisit the substantive and reasoned decisions made before my arrival at the University. Indeed, … and advance your application and dispute any aspect of the decisions by Drs. Robinson and Esteban. Consequently, not …
njcourts.gov
… litigious history, which is accurately summarized in the decisions that accompany the Law Division orders. We also … not parties to this appeal. We confine our review to the decisions pertaining to the Association's motions. 8 … expressed by the motion judges in their well-reasoned decisions. We add only the following remarks. 17 A-2154-19 …
njcourts.gov
… 348, 358-59 (1973)). "We may overturn the . . . Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious. … Bd., 104 N.J. Super. 294, 300 (App. Div. 1969). "Parole decisions shall be based on the aggregate of all pertinent …
-
njcourts.gov
… petitioners E.D. and I.W. challenge separate final agency decisions of the Department of Human Services (DHS), … services. On appeal, petitioners primarily claim DMAHS's decisions were arbitrary and capricious because reduction in … N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1 to -15. We disagree and affirm both decisions. I. We glean the pertinent facts and procedural …
-
njcourts.gov
… POINT IV. THE PROVOST IS NOT EMPOWERED TO MAKE HIS DECISIONS BY FIAT. POINT V. SETON HALL'S ARBITRARY DECISION … is not a basis to revisit the substantive and reasoned decisions made before my arrival at the University. Indeed, … and advance your application and dispute any aspect of the decisions by Drs. Robinson and Esteban. Consequently, not …
-
njcourts.gov
… was somehow not in a proper capacity to be able to make the decisions he made and it's belied by the agreement. It's … 11, 2019, February 28, 2020, and April 17, 2020 oral decisions that he was familiar with the issues raised in … not set forth "a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
… litigious history, which is accurately summarized in the decisions that accompany the Law Division orders. We also … not parties to this appeal. We confine our review to the decisions pertaining to the Association's motions. 8 … expressed by the motion judges in their well-reasoned decisions. We add only the following remarks. 17 A-2154-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… 348, 358-59 (1973)). "We may overturn the . . . Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious. … Bd., 104 N.J. Super. 294, 300 (App. Div. 1969). "Parole decisions shall be based on the aggregate of all pertinent …
njcourts.gov
… obtained. As the ALJ and Director noted in their respective decisions, the regulation at issue here does not incorporate … As the ALJ and Director noted in their respective decisions, there is nothing in the rule, which suggests the …