-
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0796-22 NESLIHAN CAKIROGLU, Complainant-Appellant, v. 6305 BOULEVARD EAST ASSOCIATES LP … Submitted April 1, 2025 – Decided June 26, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Smith. On appeal from the New … complainant's eviction throughout her ERAP application process. Complainant's rental assistance application was …
-
njcourts.gov
… Kelly S. Crawford - NJ Attorney ID #029141993 RIKER DANZIG LLP FILED MAR … set : I. II. III. Fact Discovery - Fact Discovery has been completed . Expert Discovery 1. All Plaintiff and Defense … as to permit electronic signatures to be used in all filing processes temporarily authorized to be used during the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 3, 2025 – Decided November 20, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and Bergman. On appeal from the … application, seeking to divert the case from the criminal process. The vicinage's Criminal Division manager recommended against defendant's admission into PTI. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 5, 2025 – Decided November 17, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Rose. On appeal from the … boyfriend, defendant Christopher Curi, from plaintiff's cab company, HV Cab, LLC. In November 2023, plaintiff filed a … Below) II. THE TRIAL COURT VIOLATED [DEFENDANT]'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BY ENTERING JUDGMENT IN THE ABSENCE OF HER …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 5, 2025 – Decided November 14, 2025 Before Judges Perez Friscia and Vinci. On appeal from the … filed a motion in aid of litigant's rights seeking to compel defendant to respond to the subpoena. Defendant … of a judgment so that the [Division] may use the judicial process of our courts to collect taxes." Lastly, the court …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 6, 2022 – Decided October 19, 2022 Before Judges Firko and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … order denying recusal of the judge. I. Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking damages of $9,721.77 due on defendant's … NOT DISPUTED, FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS, AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW. 1 12 U.S.C. § 5536(a)(1)(B); 15 U.S.C. § …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 6, 2022 – Decided October 19, 2022 Before Judges Firko and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … order denying recusal of the judge. I. Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking damages of $9,721.77 due on defendant's … NOT DISPUTED, FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS, AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW. 1 12 U.S.C. § 5536(a)(1)(B); 15 U.S.C. § …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 6, 2022 – Decided October 19, 2022 Before Judges Firko and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … order denying recusal of the judge. I. Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking damages of $9,721.77 due on defendant's … NOT DISPUTED, FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS, AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW. 1 12 U.S.C. § 5536(a)(1)(B); 15 U.S.C. § …
njcourts.gov
… Defendants-Respondents. _______________________________ NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … agreed to pay 1.5 million dollars to the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC). Direct purchasers of RO-RO shipping … intended to: (1) establish a nondiscriminatory regulatory process for the common carriage of goods by water in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendants-Respondents. _______________________________ NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … agreed to pay 1.5 million dollars to the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC). Direct purchasers of RO-RO shipping … intended to: (1) establish a nondiscriminatory regulatory process for the common carriage of goods by water in the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 2, 2025 – Decided December 10, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … Docket No. SC-001453-24. PinilisHalpern, LLP, attorneys for appellant (Gabriel H. Halpern, of counsel and on the … void when a substantial deviation from service of process rules has occurred, casting reasonable doubt on …
default
… Submitted November 27, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Hoffman. On appeal from Superior … counsel appeared for trial nine days after the action's commencement. After denying Kaitlyn's request for an … REFUSAL TO ADJOURN THE TRIAL VIOLATED PLAINTIFF'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS. III. THE TRIAL COURT'S FINDINGS ARE NOT …
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 28, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … defendant based upon its credibility finding that defendant committed acts of domestic violence against plaintiff, his … not unilaterally by [counsel], if civil cases are to be processed in an orderly and expeditious manner." Vargas v. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 21, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Manahan. On appeal from the Superior … January 19, 2014. The Criminal Division Manager's letter recommending against her admission into the PTI program stated … because she was not amenable "to the rehabilitative process of PTI." Defendant appealed, and the rejection of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 21, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Manahan. On appeal from the Superior … January 19, 2014. The Criminal Division Manager's letter recommending against her admission into the PTI program stated … because she was not amenable "to the rehabilitative process of PTI." Defendant appealed, and the rejection of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 28, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … defendant based upon its credibility finding that defendant committed acts of domestic violence against plaintiff, his … not unilaterally by [counsel], if civil cases are to be processed in an orderly and expeditious manner." Vargas v. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 27, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Hoffman. On appeal from Superior … counsel appeared for trial nine days after the action's commencement. After denying Kaitlyn's request for an … REFUSAL TO ADJOURN THE TRIAL VIOLATED PLAINTIFF'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS. III. THE TRIAL COURT'S FINDINGS ARE NOT …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 2, 2025 – Decided December 10, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … Docket No. SC-001453-24. PinilisHalpern, LLP, attorneys for appellant (Gabriel H. Halpern, of counsel and on the … void when a substantial deviation from service of process rules has occurred, casting reasonable doubt on …
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MERCER … 2021 Michael A. Amantia, Assistant County Counsel, argued for the Mercer County Adjuster (Paul A. Adezio, Mercer … N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.10(a)(1). Pursuant to C.M.: the process in place allows a facility to hold an individual for …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 3, 2024 – Decided January 8, 2025 Before Judges Smith and Vanek. On appeal from the Victims of Crime Compensation Review Board, VCCO No. 113819. M.M., appellant … through a metal detector during the security screening process. When she asked an agent to explain any criteria …