njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4478-18T2 RONALD RICE, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted December 8, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0377-24 STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M.C., a juvenile. _______________________ Submitted March 18, 2025 – Decided April 15, 2025 Before Judges Firko and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4478-18T2 RONALD RICE, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted December 8, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal …
-
njcourts.gov
… not set forth "a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
… severe. Appellate review of administrative agency decisions is limited. A reviewing court generally will not … and appellant does not identify, anything in the respective decisions to suggest the invocation of an adverse inference …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0497-16T1 POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 277, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS AND SHERIFF, Defendants-Respondents. Argued December 20, 2017 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0377-24 STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M.C., a juvenile. _______________________ Submitted March 18, 2025 – Decided April 15, 2025 Before Judges Firko and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal …
-
njcourts.gov
… and was 'inexcusable' and 'intolerable.'" Citing seminal decisions issued by our Supreme Court, the Commission … Super. 429, 437 (App. Div. 2001). Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions … 578 (1982)). Because appellate courts defer to the agency's decisions, reviewing courts should consider "whether such …
-
njcourts.gov
… Prison, 268 N.J. Super. 301, 304 (App. Div. 1993). Board decisions are "accorded a strong presumption of …
-
njcourts.gov
… the decision in an adjudication report reasons for the decisions. The adjudication reports show that the DHO relied … In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. at 194). We review agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard. …
default
… HEARING OFFICER. Our review of final administrative agency decisions is limited. Malacow v. N.J. Dep't of Corr., 457 …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1555-17T3 RAY BENEVENTO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. Argued November 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and …
njcourts.gov
… in parole matters. Our standard of review of the Board's decisions is limited, and "grounded in strong public policy … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5263-16T4 L.G., Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted November 26, 2018 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… in parole matters. Our standard of review of the Board's decisions is limited, and "grounded in strong public policy … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
For use only in Division of Child Protection and Permanency cases Defendant’s Initials: Date: Revised Form Promulgated by Notice to the Bar 08/19/2019, CN 10983 page 1 of 3 New Jersey Judiciary Voluntary Surrender of Parental Rights Form Defendant’s name: …
-
njcourts.gov
… HEARING OFFICER. Our review of final administrative agency decisions is limited. Malacow v. N.J. Dep't of Corr., 457 …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5263-16T4 L.G., Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted November 26, 2018 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1555-17T3 RAY BENEVENTO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. Argued November 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and …
default
… petitioners E.D. and I.W. challenge separate final agency decisions of the Department of Human Services (DHS), … services. On appeal, petitioners primarily claim DMAHS's decisions were arbitrary and capricious because reduction in … N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1 to -15. We disagree and affirm both decisions. I. We glean the pertinent facts and procedural …