-
4.10N
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… that a new and different contract has been substituted for the old one. The defendant claims as follows: NOTE TO … entered into under duress is void, or merely voidable. Compare Shanley & Fisher, P.C. v. Sisselman, 215 N.J. Super. … Could the defendant have resisted the threat by getting relief from the courts?12 Did defendant resist such …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 12, 2020 – Decided June 15, 2020 Before Judges Fisher and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … convicted of felony- murder, armed robbery, conspiracy to commit robbery, and related weapons offenses for his … When defendant arrived, he spoke with Warfle and Reed together, and told them that he and Andy Torres went to the BP …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 1, 2023 – Decided May 8, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and Vernoia. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … back seat. Following an investigation, the Division filed a complaint and order to show cause for care and supervision … "she knows she had an alcohol problem[,] and she needed to get the help she needed." Lugo also explained she reviewed …
-
A-0478-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… of New Jersey Appellate Division Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex Post Office Box 006 Trenton, New Jersey 08626 Re … memorandum, pursuant to R. 2:6-2(b), in lieu of a more formal brief submitted on behalf of the State of New Jersey. … time defendant spent in New York, detectives were unable to get to his location there in time to conduct surveillance. …
-
A-3624-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Parkway Roseland, New Jersey 07068 ecapozzi@bracheichler.com ihylton@bracheichler.com Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellants Date of Revision: … to a pre-existing flaw defect formed during the extrusion process from the factory. (5T: 228:12-22). Once the right …
-
A-3624-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Parkway Roseland, New Jersey 07068 ecapozzi@bracheichler.com ihylton@bracheichler.com Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellants Date of Revision: … to a pre-existing flaw defect formed during the extrusion process from the factory. (5T: 228:12-22). Once the right …
-
A-3624-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Parkway Roseland, New Jersey 07068 ecapozzi@bracheichler.com ihylton@bracheichler.com Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellants Date of Revision: … to a pre-existing flaw defect formed during the extrusion process from the factory. (5T: 228:12-22). Once the right …
njcourts.gov
… * NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE … contents of the Chapter 91 request. “The touchstone of due process is fair notice and an opportunity to be heard. The …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … 1,500. 3 A-0712-20 In October 2020, Asphalt Paving commenced this action and obtained an order to show cause … the statute's context. N.J.S.A. 1:1-1. In engaging in this process, we are not free to "rewrite a plainly-written …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 18, 2024 – Decided June 27, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Mawla. On appeal from the Board of … the following notice: IMPORTANT: This decision will become final, unless, within twenty . . . days of the date of … was 4 A-0097-23 unaware there was a separate application process for pandemic unemployment assistance. Appellate …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 15, 2024 – Decided August 29, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … 5, 2023 order denying their motion to amend an unverified complaint. We conclude an unverified complaint found to be a … 2014). "That exercise of discretion requires a two-step process: whether the non-moving party will be prejudiced, …
default
… Submitted September 26, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Ostrer and Currier. On appeal from … three children from Sharon's care in April 2013 after she committed an act of domestic violence in front of two of the … that the children, who 2 "'[S]elect home adoption' [is] a process that includes looking for an adoptive home in New …
default
… Submitted September 6, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and DeAlmeida. On appeal from Superior … judgment of foreclosure, and to dismiss with prejudice the complaint filed against him in this matter. Before denying … remanded the matter back to the Office of Foreclosure for processing as an uncontested action. Plaintiff filed a …
default
… Argued July 16, 2018 – Decided August 3, 2018 Before Judges Whipple and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … 26, 2017 order denying his application to be removed from community supervision for life (CSL) under N.J.S.A. … MAKING CREDIBILITY FINDINGS OF THE EXPERT DENYING R.J. DUE PROCESS. POINT II: REGISTRANT MET THE FIRST CRITERIA FOR …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 20, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Currier and Geiger. On appeal from the Board of … in the classroom, there was blatant disregard for the process for the 4 A-5532-15T3 guidance and coaching she was … or know the exact policies involved or at least use common sense to react appropriately. The fact that the …
njcourts.gov
… January 26, 2018 – Decided February 7, 2018 Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior … II DENYING DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO TESTIFY AS TO HIS THOUGHT PROCESS AND MOTIVATION FOR COMMITTING THE CRIME OF WHICH HE WAS CONVICTED DENIED THE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 22, 2021 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Currier. On appeal from the … a life sentence. As the PCR judge noted, defendant will become eligible for parole consideration as early as the age … already upheld by this court on direct appeal in the SOA process. We discern no necessity to remand the case at this …
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1381-16T2 CLIFFORD J. GRAF, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF … Appellant was twenty-two years old at the time he committed these crimes. He will be fifty-seven years old in … After he exhausted the DOC's administrative review process, appellant sought judicial review of this decision …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 13, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Mayer. On appeal from the Board of … was scheduled for October 9, 2018. However, due to a "miscommunication during the registration process," Hersh was unable to participate in that hearing. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 7, 2020 – Decided January 22, 2020 Before Judges Fisher and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … a third time; we rejected his double jeopardy and due process arguments, Kosch III, 458 N.J. Super. at 347, but we … our remand burdened the trial judge with "a difficult and uncomfortable task" in light of his insistence on imposing on …