njcourts.gov
… Submitted August 10, 2020 – Decided August 25, 2020 Before Judges Moynihan and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … . . . FOR RELEASE. We disagree and affirm. 1 Defendant completed an aggregate seven-year prison term with forty-two …
njcourts.gov
… telephonically August 10, 2020 – Decided August 21, 2020 Before Judges Moynihan and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … a teacher was entitled at the time his leave of absence commenced . . . shall be restored to him upon his return. …
njcourts.gov
… Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. … Argued September 16, 2019 – Decided NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … these two appeals that have been consolidated due to their common issues, petitioners Jason Fairchild and William …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 15, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Sumners and Natali. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … stop, the police seized three kilos of heroin hidden in a compartment installed underneath defendant's car. Defendant … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE POST-CONVICTION RELIEF COURT ERRED IN …
njcourts.gov
… October 23, 2019 — Decided Before Judges Gooden Brown and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … the standard of review and renumbered the remaining points accordingly. 4 A-0826-18T4 SUFFICIENTLY PROVIDES A … the mandatory nature of the test in such a way as to impel compliance with the test." This appeal followed. "On this …
njcourts.gov
… K. WILLIAMS, RAKEEM R. WILLIAMS, RASHAMOND WILLIAMS, RASHAMAND WILLIAMS, RASHON WILLIAMS, and RASKEEN WILLIAMS, … Submitted September 30, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … he conducted an inadequate investigation and improperly recommended defendant enter a guilty plea to aggravated …
njcourts.gov
… v. LAMONT LOPER, a/k/a LAMONT ROPER, MUHAMMAD LATIF and LOTTI LAMONT, Defendant-Appellant. … Submitted February 12, 2020 – Decided May 18, 2020 Before Judges Koblitz and Whipple. On appeal from the Superior … detective "observed the vehicle with a female in the car come through the toll booth, the right lane, pay 4 …
default
… A-1867-17T4 PARK CREST CLEANERS, LLC, d/b/a A PLUS CLEANERS AND ALTERATIONS, SALVATORE TAMBURO, and DANIELA TAMBURO, … LLC, Salvatore Tamburo, and Daniela Tamburo (plaintiffs) commenced this action against defendants A Plus Cleaners and … failure to join Cherry Plaza, the second, fifth, and sixth points attack the judge's October 2015 rulings on …
default
… BUTCHYK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF CALDWELL and BOROUGH OF CALDWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT, … Argued July 6, 2021 – Decided December 7, 2021 Before Judges Messano and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … 40A:14- 147, including but not limited to: conduct unbecoming a superior officer, neglect of duty, and failure to …
default
… Submitted November 17, 2021 – Decided December 6, 2021 Before Judges Gilson and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … which added a new mitigating factor for crimes committed by persons under the age of twenty-six, should be …
default
… GEICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. __________________________ … Argued November 15, 2021 – Decided December 1, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from the Superior Court of New …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 10, 2021 – Decided April 13, 2021 Before Judges Whipple, Rose and Firko. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … Slaby, LLC, appeals from the July 1, 2019 dismissal of its complaint and December 4, 2019 denial of its motion for …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 25, 2021 – Decided March 8, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and Rothstadt. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … & (b)(6). He pled guilty in exchange for the prosecutor's recommendation that defendant be sentenced to a period of no …
default
… AGENCY, INC., NU HOLDINGS, INC., BRIAN NORMAN, and CHRISTOPHER NORMAN, Defendants-Respondents. … Argued October 14, 2021 – Decided October 29, 2021 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … serve as: a) Managing Director of defendant's Personal and Commercial Boater Safety Associations; b) Managing Director …
default
… Argued September 29, 2021 – Decided October 28, 2021 Before Judges Fuentes and Gilson. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … obligations under Megan's Law, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-1 to -23, and community supervision for life (CSL), N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6.4. He …
default
… Argued February 14, 2022 – Decided March 2, 2022 Before Judges Sabatino and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … dispensary packaging." The troopers also smelled marijuana coming from defendant's truck. When the troopers asked if …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0425-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMITMENT OF C.M. ________________________ Submitted … 7, 2020 – Decided November 9, 2021 Before Judges Fuentes and Firko. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … matters, and pursuant to [N.J.S.A.] 3B:12-49, the [c]ourt appoints a guardian to exercise these powers on behalf of the …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0424-19 LAWRENCE "LARRY" WAINSTEIN and ELIZABETH VIOLE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. 8619 HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, and NORTH BERGEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, … Argued January 11, 2021 – Decided November 8, 2021 Before Judges Messano and Smith. On appeal from the Superior …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 16, 2025 – Decided October 1, 2025 Before Judges Gilson and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the New Jersey Department … staff are not in the record. 3 A-1889-23 Johnson being non-compliant and heard him yell, "There[ is] nothing in my lip …
njcourts.gov
… 16, 2025 – Decided September 26, 2025 Before Judges Rose and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from the Superior Court … appeal. Those issues included: the legality of the complaint warrants; "whether attaching conditions to a … In his merits brief, defendant now raises the following points for our consideration: I. DEFENDANT HAS THE RIGHT TO …