-
njcourts.gov
… Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and AMERICAN ADDICTION CENTERS, INC., Respondents. … Submitted October 18, 2023 – Decided November 6, 2023 Before Judges Vernoia and Gummer. On appeal from the Board of … claimant "was given a full and impartial hearing and a complete opportunity to offer any and all evidence," and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 13, 2024 – Decided May 20, 2024 Before Judges Mawla and Chase. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, … March 9, 2023 adjudication of delinquency for acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute third-degree receipt …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 29, 2024 – Decided May 10, 2024 Before Judges Mawla, Chase and Vinci. On appeal from the New Jersey State Parole Board. … 3 A-3120-21 opportunities on parole but violated both by committing new criminal offenses. He has committed …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 4, 2025 – Decided July 18, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and Bergman. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … challenge the affidavit in support of a wiretap order and communication data warrants (CDW). The gravamen of …
-
njcourts.gov
… ALFRED PETROSSIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF RUTHERFORD and FRANK NUNZIATO, in his official capacity as Mayor, … the October 20, 2023 Chancery Division order dismissing his complaint against the Borough of Rutherford (Borough) and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 11, 2025 – Decided July 11, 2025 Before Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the Superior Court of … was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and with the advice of competent counsel. On March 6, 2020, pursuant to the plea …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 2, 2025 – Decided November 20, 2025 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior Court of New … the remaining counts of the indictment against him and recommend a nineteen-year 3 A-3868-23 sentence, subject to the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and BERAT CORPORATION, Respondents. … Submitted October 15, 2025 – Decided November 26, 2025 Before Judges Gilson and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the … feet apart, and limited the number of customers that could come inside the store at any given time. Tronlone testified …
-
njcourts.gov
… this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. ## … and mitigating factors found were not 'based upon competent credible evidence in the record;' or (3) 'the … 2014) (holding the court, at its discretion, could "fully revisit," a mandatory consecutive ten-year sentence for felony …
-
njcourts.gov
… Petitioner-Respondent, v. PAYCHEX, Respondent-Appellant, and PROP N SPOON, Respondent-Respondent. … Argued February 5, 2026 – Decided February 25, 2026 Before Judges Mawla and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from an interlocutory order of the Division of Workers' Compensation, Department of Labor and Workforce Development, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2097-24 A.T., a minor, by and through P.T., parent and natural guardian, … Submitted January 5, 2026 – Decided March 10, 2026 Before Judges Walcott-Henderson and Bergman. On appeal from … to defendant Toli Vurganov and dismissing plaintiff's complaint for injuries caused by alleged lead poisoning from …
default
… STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JEFFREY O. VANDERPOOL, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ … Submitted November 14, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Firko. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law …
default
… Submitted April 1, 2019 – Decided May 29, 2019 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, … defendant Qiana M. Brown. Plaintiff presents the following points for our review: I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN THE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 7, 2017 - Decided Before Judges Reisner and Koblitz. On appeal from the Superior … sentence. On this appeal, defendant presents the following points of argument: THE EXTENDED TERM IN THIS CASE, WHICH …
default
… OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0903-19 SANTANDER BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NORA V. LOPEZ, … answer, and denying defendant's cross-motion to dismiss the complaint; (2) final judgment; and (3) an order in which, … of the order. "Without cross-appealing, a party may argue points the trial court either rejected or did not address, …
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RONY CHERY, Defendant, and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE CO., … JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JERRY TYRE, Defendant, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … contract, the State-creditor, to alter the most essential component of the bail contract . . . than was originally …
-
4.10A
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… JUDGE In preparing the 1998 revisions to this charge, the Committee patterned much of its work on Robert E. Kehoe, … both, the specific charges that follow dealing with those points are designed to supplement or modify the basic charge … plaintiff’s performance obligations. Besides supplementing and modifying the basic charge by incorporating the specific …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0903-19 SANTANDER BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NORA V. LOPEZ, … answer, and denying defendant's cross-motion to dismiss the complaint; (2) final judgment; and (3) an order in which, … of the order. "Without cross-appealing, a party may argue points the trial court either rejected or did not address, …
-
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RONY CHERY, Defendant, and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE CO., … JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JERRY TYRE, Defendant, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … contract, the State-creditor, to alter the most essential component of the bail contract . . . than was originally …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 1, 2019 – Decided May 29, 2019 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, … defendant Qiana M. Brown. Plaintiff presents the following points for our review: I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN THE …